Skip to content

chore(OMN-18010): post-release dev version bump to 0.4.91 [release-on-merge] - #2558

Merged
onexbot-occ-writer[bot] merged 1 commit into
devfrom
automation/omn-18010-post-release-dev-bump-0.4.91
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

onexbot-occ-writer[bot] merged 1 commit into
devfrom
automation/omn-18010-post-release-dev-bump-0.4.91

Conversation

@onexbot-occ-writer

@onexbot-occ-writer onexbot-occ-writer Bot commented Sep 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Automated post-release disarm step (OMN-18010, porting OMN-13912). Publishing v0.4.90 left dev's [project].version equal to the highest published tag, which ARMS the OMN-16344 release-identity gate (scripts/check_release_identity.py) against every subsequent dev PR that touches src/**.

This PR bumps [project].version to 0.4.91 and re-locks uv.lock, so the gate is disarmed by the same flow that armed it rather than by whichever unrelated PR trips it first.

The title carries the release-on-merge marker on purpose: this commit touches pyproject.toml, so without the marker its own merge would re-enter the release workflow and publish an empty version.

Ticket

OMN-18010 — release on merge for every publishing repo.

Triggered by

https://github.com/OmniNode-ai/omnimarket/actions/runs/34908446793

Test plan

  • the release-identity gate is green on this PR (that IS the behaviour under test)
  • CI passes (lockfile resolves)

Evidence-Ticket: OMN-18010
Evidence-Source: OCC#9599

Disarms the OMN-16344 release-identity gate that publishing
v0.4.90 armed against dev.

Triggered-by: https://github.com/OmniNode-ai/omnimarket/actions/runs/34908446793
@onexbot-occ-writer
onexbot-occ-writer Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) September 15, 2026 01:42
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Architectural Review — PASSED

Errors: 0
Warnings: 0

What this checks

Rule Description
ARCH-TOPIC-001 No hardcoded Kafka topic strings in handler code
ARCH-DI-001 No event_bus=None bypass
ARCH-DI-002 No direct Handler instantiation outside workflow_runner/adapters
ARCH-DI-003 No reinvented DI containers
ARCH-TOPIC-002 contract.yaml topics follow `onex.{cmd

No architectural violations found.

Static architectural lint — no model inference (OMN-14176).

@onexbot-occ-writer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

OCC autobind did not mint a companion for this PR: no changed-file candidate could be proven RED against the merge base, and emitting a PR-existence probe instead would be non-falsifiable evidence (OMN-15247). Hand-authored evidence is required.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Hostile Reviewer — PASSED

Blocking findings (critical/error): 0
Total findings: 0
Models succeeded: qwen3-review,qwen3-review-b


Gate semantics

Verdict Meaning Blocks merge?
passed >=2 models succeeded, no critical/error findings No
blocked CRITICAL or ERROR findings found Yes
degraded Fewer than 2 models succeeded (infra unavailable/timeout) Yes (OMN-15110)

Powered by omniintelligence.review_pairing.cli_review — node-based adversarial review via HandlerLlmCliSubprocess (OMN-8524)

jonahgabriel pushed a commit to OmniNode-ai/onex_change_control that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2026
…9599)

* evidence: OCC companion pass 1 for OmniNode-ai/omnimarket#2558

* evidence: OCC companion self-bind for #9599

---------

Co-authored-by: node-occ-companion-effect <occ-companion-effect@omninode.ai>
@onexbot-occ-writer
onexbot-occ-writer Bot merged commit fd5c822 into dev Sep 15, 2026
175 of 184 checks passed
@onexbot-occ-writer
onexbot-occ-writer Bot deleted the automation/omn-18010-post-release-dev-bump-0.4.91 branch September 15, 2026 02:53
Patel230 pushed a commit to OmniNode-ai/onex_change_control that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2026
…9599)

* evidence: OCC companion pass 1 for OmniNode-ai/omnimarket#2558

* evidence: OCC companion self-bind for #9599

---------

Co-authored-by: node-occ-companion-effect <occ-companion-effect@omninode.ai>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants