Repository navigation
feat(contracts): implement ModelContractVersion with typed semver fields [OMN-154] #116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jonahgabriel
merged 6 commits into
main
from
jonah/omn-154-06-create-modelcontractversion-with-typed-semver-fields
Dec 8, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bb3972b
feat(contracts): implement ModelContractVersion with typed semver fie…
jonahgabriel 7876212
fix(contracts): address PR review feedback for ModelContractVersion […
jonahgabriel 3550418
chore: migrate pre-commit config to modern stage names
jonahgabriel 5ab98c6
fix(contracts): complete PR #116 review feedback and fix ONEX validat…
jonahgabriel b2aaf38
fix(ci): resolve ruff import sorting and test failures
jonahgabriel 20b8528
refactor(mixins): move MixinNodeTypeValidator to correct location
jonahgabriel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
File renamed without changes.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logical inconsistency:
omnibase_corespecial handling at line 406 is now dead code.Since
omnibase_coreis now inPROTOCOL_ALLOWED_REPOS(line 368), the protocol counting block (lines 382-417) is entirely skipped foromnibase_core. This makes the special case at line 406 (max_protocols = 7 if self.repo_name == "omnibase_core" else 3) unreachable.If this is intentional (protocol counting should not apply to allowed repos), consider removing the dead code for clarity. If protocol counting should still apply to
omnibase_core, the condition needs adjustment.Alternatively, if protocol counting should be completely disabled for allowed repos, remove lines 396-417 (the
omnibase_corespecial case comment and handling).