-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Aggregate and pack sync committee messages #15608
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f1227d2
Aggregate and pack sync committee messages
rkapka ba43196
test
rkapka 0d90d56
simplify error check
rkapka 014075a
changelog <3
rkapka b510ba2
Merge branch 'develop' into agg-sc-messages
rkapka 8a0deaf
fix assert import
rkapka 3e4a35e
remove parallelization
rkapka 6e22b97
use sync committee cache
rkapka 8413d42
ignore bits already set in pool messages
rkapka 8cb850a
Merge branch '__develop' into agg-sc-messages
rkapka 8d03f2e
fuzz fix
rkapka 515f517
cleanup
rkapka 0d72e20
test panic fix
rkapka dcf6d25
clear cache in tests
rkapka 9ec9ff6
Merge branch 'develop' into agg-sc-messages
rkapka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this adding aggregated contributions to the current list of already aggregated contributions
proposerContributions? shouldn't we aggregate them together otherwise we are likely to create non-trivial intersections among the signing indices rendering the aggregates unaggregatable?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I forgot that if we aggregate messages that are already part of some aggregate with messages that are not, it can be hard to get a better total aggregate. One mitigation I see is to discard messages that are already in
proposerContributionsby looking at appropriate bits. Did you have another solution in mind?