Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moved data items to individuals #33

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

giacomodecolle
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in a previous call, I have made classes taken from O NET into individuals on the data side of the ontology. A new relation is introduced to mirror the "narrower than" relation in O NET.
@johnbeve @zhengj2007

Through a python script, I have moved O NET occupation holder classes to instances of a new data item classes. Whether this class will then be moved in a different place of the GDC hierarchy in order to match efforts in OMRSE is still an open discussion. I have also created a new object property to match the hierarchy in O NET (narrower than). The file is in .ttl for readability. I have of course no idea of how to put this into a format that is welcome to the main repo.
Added .owl version in rdf format of OccO individuals
Deleted .ttl version of the individuals file
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengj2007 zhengj2007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please make changes in the templates and run 'make modules' to update the OWL file?
The occo.owl is release not development version of OCCO.

@giacomodecolle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Of course, could you help me understand how to do that?

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Contributor

@johnbeve
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengj2007, @giacomodecolle does not have much experience using ROBOT or your templates. Would you mind meeting with him and illustrating the process?

@giacomodecolle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zhengj2007 thanks for the link. As @johnbeve said, I am unfortunately not familiar enough with ROBOT. The issue is exacerbated by the fact that the changes I made involve probably hundreds of classes, which makes it almost impossible to do entirely by hand. I would greatly appreciate your help in sorting this out.

@CarterBeauBenson
Copy link

Was this ever resolved? If not, can we ignore this update method since it seems to be a barrier to development?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants