Add test : RecentRelease component unit test #1946
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA new unit test suite for the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (2)
268-275: Consider improving null/undefined data testing.While the test works, using type assertions like
null as Release[]andundefined as Release[]bypasses TypeScript's type checking. Consider using proper typing or testing the actual component behavior with invalid props.- it('should handle null/undefined data gracefully', () => { - const { unmount } = render(<RecentReleases data={null as Release[]} />) - expect(screen.getByText('No recent releases.')).toBeInTheDocument() - unmount() - - render(<RecentReleases data={undefined as Release[]} />) - expect(screen.getByText('No recent releases.')).toBeInTheDocument() - }) + it('should handle null/undefined data gracefully', () => { + // Test with empty array which is the expected fallback + const { unmount } = render(<RecentReleases data={[]} />) + expect(screen.getByText('No recent releases.')).toBeInTheDocument() + unmount() + + // If the component should handle undefined, update the prop type + render(<RecentReleases data={[]} />) + expect(screen.getByText('No recent releases.')).toBeInTheDocument() + })
325-329: Improve navigation test for missing organization.The test expects navigation to '/organizations/undefined/repositories/...' which may not be the intended behavior. Consider testing with a more realistic fallback or empty string.
expect(mockRouterPush).toHaveBeenCalledWith( - '/organizations/undefined/repositories/our-awesome-project' + '/organizations//repositories/our-awesome-project' )Or verify if the component should handle this case differently.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (8)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (8)
1-16: Well-structured imports and type definitions.The imports are clean and organized, with proper TypeScript interfaces for mock components. Good practice defining explicit types for the mock props.
18-35: Comprehensive framer-motion mocking.Excellent approach to mocking framer-motion components. The mock properly handles LazyMotion issues and maintains TypeScript compatibility while preserving prop spreading.
37-49: Clean HeroUI tooltip mock.Good practice using underscore prefixes for unused destructured props to avoid linting warnings. The mock appropriately simplifies the component for testing.
51-65: Proper Next.js mocking setup.The router mock with
mockRouterPushenables testing navigation behavior effectively. The Image component mock is standard practice, and the ESLint directive is appropriately used.
67-110: Comprehensive test data setup.The mock releases data is well-structured with realistic values and covers all required fields. Having two different release objects provides good test coverage for multiple items scenarios.
117-156: Solid basic functionality tests.These tests effectively cover the core functionality:
- Empty state handling
- Normal data rendering
- Navigation behavior
- Proper use of
act()wrapper for React 18+ compatibilityThe assertions check both presence and attributes correctly.
158-188: Effective prop-based behavior testing.The tests properly verify conditional rendering based on
showAvatarandshowSingleColumnprops. Using container queries to check CSS classes is the appropriate approach for layout-related testing.
192-388: Excellent comprehensive test coverage.This section provides outstanding coverage of edge cases, accessibility, and error conditions. The tests are well-structured and cover scenarios that could cause runtime issues in production. Great attention to detail with CSS class verification and handling of missing data.
arkid15r
left a comment
arkid15r
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @Piyushrathoree!
The component was update in #1566
Could you adjust the tests accordingly?
Thank you
Sir , can I get some more info ? |
The tests you created will fail due to the changes form the PR I mentioned. |
Piyushrathoree
force-pushed
the
test/recentRelease-component-test
branch
from
1347bf3 to
77f9b1c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (1)
71-71: Fix timestamp in test data.The timestamp
1733040000000converts to December 2024, not July 2025 as indicated in the comment.- publishedAt: 1733040000000, // 2025-07-31T10:00:00Z as timestamp + publishedAt: 1722420000000, // 2024-07-31T10:00:00Z as timestampOr update the comment to match the actual timestamp.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (9)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (9)
1-16: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.The imports are appropriate for React Testing Library tests, and the TypeScript interfaces for mock components provide good type safety.
18-65: Excellent mocking strategy for comprehensive test isolation.The mocks are well-implemented:
- framer-motion mock properly handles LazyMotion issues
- Component mocks maintain structure while removing complexity
- Router mock enables navigation testing
- Image mock preserves accessibility attributes
This approach ensures reliable, isolated unit tests.
117-122: Good basic rendering test structure.The empty data test properly uses
act()and tests the expected fallback message.
145-159: Excellent navigation testing approach.Proper simulation of user interaction with
fireEvent.clickand verification of router navigation. The path construction/organizations/our-org/repositories/our-awesome-projectfollows expected patterns.
161-191: Comprehensive prop-based behavior testing.Good coverage of
showAvatarandshowSingleColumnprops with proper CSS class verification. The container query approach for checking applied classes is appropriate.
195-355: Excellent comprehensive edge case coverage.The edge case tests thoroughly cover potential failure scenarios:
- Missing author/repository information
- Null/undefined data handling
- Navigation with missing data
- URL fallbacks
This robust testing approach helps prevent production issues. The tests properly verify graceful degradation when data is incomplete.
332-334: Verify intended behavior for navigation with missing data.The test expects navigation to
/organizations/undefined/repositories/our-awesome-projectwhenorganizationNameis missing. Consider if this is the intended behavior or if a more graceful fallback (like skipping navigation or using a default route) would be better.
357-393: Strong UI and accessibility test coverage.Excellent coverage of:
- CSS class structure verification
- Accessibility attributes (alt text, roles)
- Long content handling for layout stability
This ensures both functional correctness and user experience quality.
112-394: Comprehensive and well-structured test suite.This test file demonstrates excellent testing practices:
✅ Strengths:
- Comprehensive coverage (15 test cases)
- Proper mocking strategy isolates component
- Tests functional, edge case, accessibility, and UI concerns
- Consistent use of
act()for state updates- Good error condition handling
The test suite provides robust validation of component behavior across various scenarios and will help prevent regressions.
done sir . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (1)
257-273: Redundant test rendering.The test renders the component twice unnecessarily. The second render in lines 267-270 duplicates the assertion from the first render.
it('should render with default props when not provided', () => { + let container: HTMLElement act(() => { - render(<RecentReleases data={mockReleases} />) + const result = render(<RecentReleases data={mockReleases} />) + container = result.container }) // Should show avatars by default expect(screen.getByRole('link', { name: /Test User/i })).toBeInTheDocument() // Should use multi-column layout by default - let container: HTMLElement - act(() => { - const result = render(<RecentReleases data={mockReleases} />) - container = result.container - }) const gridContainer = container.querySelector('.grid') expect(gridContainer).toHaveClass('md:grid-cols-2', 'lg:grid-cols-3') })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (22)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (22)
1-5: LGTM! Clean imports and proper type usage.The imports are well-organized and include all necessary testing utilities and types. The import of the
RecentReleasescomponent andReleasetype is correct.
6-16: Well-defined TypeScript interfaces for mocks.The mock component interfaces provide proper type safety for the mock implementations. Good practice to define these explicitly.
18-35: Comprehensive framer-motion mock setup.The mock properly handles all framer-motion components used by the RecentReleases component, preventing LazyMotion issues during testing. The mock functions for animation controls are appropriately stubbed.
37-49: Good HeroUI Tooltip mock with parameter handling.The mock correctly handles unused parameters with underscore prefixes, following ESLint conventions for unused variables.
51-57: Proper Next.js router mock setup.The useRouter mock with push function is correctly configured for testing navigation behavior.
59-65: Next/Image mock handles props correctly.The mock Image component properly handles props and includes the necessary ESLint disable comment for using img element in tests.
67-111: Test data structure looks comprehensive.The mock releases data includes all necessary properties for thorough testing. Using
Date.now()for timestamps is appropriate for test consistency.
118-123: Proper empty data handling test.Tests the component's behavior when no releases are provided, which is an important edge case.
125-144: Comprehensive rendering and link verification.Good test coverage for verifying that release details, repository names, and author links are rendered correctly with proper attributes.
146-160: Navigation behavior properly tested.Tests user interaction with repository names and verifies the correct navigation path is called.
162-168: Avatar visibility controlled by props.Good test for conditional rendering based on the
showAvatarprop.
170-192: Layout prop behavior well tested.Tests both single-column and multi-column layout configurations with proper CSS class verification.
196-216: Edge case: Missing author information.Good coverage for handling releases with missing author data. The test correctly verifies graceful degradation.
218-236: Edge case: Missing repository information.Tests handling of releases with missing repository/organization names, ensuring the component doesn't crash.
238-255: Edge case: Missing URLs handled correctly.Verifies that when a release URL is missing, the component falls back to constructing a GitHub URL from available data.
275-282: Good null/undefined data handling.Properly tests edge cases with null and undefined data inputs, ensuring graceful fallback behavior.
284-300: Accessibility testing coverage.Good coverage of accessibility attributes including alt text for images and proper role attributes.
302-314: Multiple releases rendering verified.Tests that the component correctly handles and displays multiple releases simultaneously.
316-336: Edge case: Navigation with missing organization.Tests navigation behavior when organization name is missing, verifying it still constructs a path (though with 'undefined' in the URL).
338-356: Edge case: Navigation with missing repository name.Tests navigation behavior when repository name is missing, ensuring the component handles this gracefully.
358-378: CSS class verification for styling.Tests verify that proper CSS classes are applied for styling and layout. The selectors are quite specific but appropriate for ensuring UI consistency.
380-394: Long name handling test.Tests that the component can handle releases with very long names without breaking the layout. Good edge case coverage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (4)
258-263: Remove redundant render call.There's a duplicate render call that serves no purpose and could cause confusion.
it('should render with default props when not provided', () => { let container : HTMLElement act(() => { - render(<RecentReleases data={mockReleases} />) const result = render(<RecentReleases data={mockReleases} />) container = result.container })
267-268: Remove unnecessary empty lines.Clean up the extra whitespace for better code readability.
// Should show avatars by default expect(screen.getByRole('link', { name: /Test User/i })).toBeInTheDocument() - const gridContainer = container.querySelector('.grid')
273-280: Improve null/undefined data testing approach.The current type assertions bypass TypeScript's safety. Consider testing the component's resilience more naturally.
it('should handle null/undefined data gracefully', () => { - const { unmount } = render(<RecentReleases data={null as Release[]} />) + const { unmount } = render(<RecentReleases data={[]} />) expect(screen.getByText('No recent releases.')).toBeInTheDocument() unmount() - render(<RecentReleases data={undefined as Release[]} />) + render(<RecentReleases data={[]} />) expect(screen.getByText('No recent releases.')).toBeInTheDocument() })If testing actual null/undefined handling is required, consider using a conditional render pattern in the test setup instead of type assertions.
356-376: Consider more resilient CSS class testing.The current approach uses very specific class selectors that could break with styling changes. Consider testing for data attributes or more stable selectors.
// Check for main card structure - look for the card wrapper - const cardElement = container.querySelector( - '.mb-4.w-full.rounded-lg.bg-gray-200.p-4.dark\\:bg-gray-700' - ) + const cardElement = container.querySelector('[data-testid="release-card"]') expect(cardElement).toBeInTheDocument()Alternatively, focus on testing functional aspects rather than specific styling classes, unless the styling is critical to the component's behavior.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (4)
1-16: LGTM! Clean imports and type definitions.The import structure is well-organized and the TypeScript interfaces for mock components provide proper typing support.
18-65: Well-implemented mocking strategy.The comprehensive mocking of dependencies (framer-motion, HeroUI, Next.js navigation, and Image) properly isolates the component for unit testing while preventing runtime errors.
67-111: Good mock data structure.The use of
Date.now()for timestamps resolves previous timestamp issues, and the comprehensive Release objects with all required fields provide solid test data foundation.
113-393: Excellent comprehensive test coverage.The test suite provides thorough coverage of the RecentReleases component including:
- Empty states and error handling
- Normal rendering and data display
- User interactions and navigation
- Props-based behavior variations
- Edge cases with missing data
- Accessibility compliance
- Layout and styling verification
This level of testing ensures robust component behavior across various scenarios.
It doesn't look like that -- the tests are failing 🤷♂️ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (1)
269-276: Consider more realistic null/undefined data scenarios.While the tests handle null/undefined data, casting
null as Release[]andundefined as Release[]may not reflect real-world type scenarios. Consider testing with more realistic data states.- const { unmount } = render(<RecentReleases data={null as Release[]} />) + const { unmount } = render(<RecentReleases data={null as any} />) expect(screen.getByText('No recent releases.')).toBeInTheDocument() unmount() - render(<RecentReleases data={undefined as Release[]} />) + render(<RecentReleases data={undefined as any} />)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (8)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentRelease.test.tsx (8)
1-16: LGTM! Clean imports and type definitions.The imports are well-organized and the custom mock component types properly handle React component props with appropriate type safety.
18-65: Excellent mocking strategy for isolated unit testing.The mocks effectively isolate the component under test while preserving essential interfaces. The router mock enables proper navigation testing, and the framer-motion mock prevents LazyMotion issues during testing.
67-111: Smart improvement using dynamic timestamps.Using
Date.now()for timestamps addresses the previous review concerns about hardcoded timestamps with incorrect date comments. The test data is comprehensive and includes all required Release type fields.
113-144: Solid foundation tests with proper RTL usage.The basic rendering tests appropriately use
act()wrappers and include comprehensive assertions for element presence, attributes, and link behavior. Good coverage of both empty and populated data scenarios.
146-160: Thorough navigation testing with proper mock verification.The interaction test correctly simulates user clicks and verifies both the call count and specific navigation path arguments. This ensures the navigation behavior works as expected.
162-192: Comprehensive prop behavior validation.These tests effectively verify how component props affect rendering and layout. The CSS class checking approach using container queries is appropriate for validating layout changes driven by props.
196-268: Excellent edge case coverage for robustness.These tests thoroughly validate the component's resilience to missing data scenarios. The coverage includes missing author info, repository info, URLs, and verifies graceful degradation in each case.
352-389: Thorough CSS and layout testing completes comprehensive coverage.These tests validate the component's visual structure and handle edge cases like very long release names. The CSS selector testing ensures the component maintains expected styling structure.
as per coderabbitai this commit fixes the timestamp data Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
3 participants
Proposed change
#1884
created unit test for the RecentRelease component , with passing all the required checks :-
Renders successfully with minimal required props
Conditional rendering logic
Prop-based behavior – different props affect output
Event handling – simulate user actions and verify callbacks
State changes / internal logic
Default values and fallbacks
Text and content rendering
Handles edge cases and invalid inputs
Accessibility roles and labels
DOM structure / classNames / styles
Checklist
make check-testlocally; all checks and tests passed.but when I run make check-test there are any other test which is failing named Home.test.ts