Skip to content

Conversation

@TanushreeDattatreya24
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed change

Resolves #(put the issue number here)

Add the PR description here.

Checklist

  • I've read and followed the contributing guidelines.
  • I've run make check-test locally; all checks and tests passed.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive tests for the NavDropdown component, covering rendering, user interactions, accessibility, styling, and integration to ensure correct behavior across various scenarios.

Walkthrough

A new comprehensive unit test suite for the NavDropdown React component has been added. The tests cover rendering, behavior, accessibility, styling, prop variations, event handling, edge cases, and integration with application dependencies, ensuring the component functions correctly under various scenarios.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
NavDropdown Component Unit Tests
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx
Added a thorough test suite for the NavDropdown component, covering rendering, behavior, accessibility, styling, integration, event handling, edge cases, and prop variations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • arkid15r

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx (1)

31-619: Consider adding tests for missing accessibility features.

Based on the retrieved learnings, dropdown components should support Escape key functionality and proper keyboard navigation. While some keyboard tests exist, consider adding specific tests for:

  1. Escape key closing the dropdown from any focused submenu item
  2. Arrow key navigation between submenu items
  3. Tab key behavior when dropdown is open
it('closes dropdown with Escape key from submenu items', async () => {
  const user = userEvent.setup();
  render(<NavDropdown {...defaultProps} />);
  
  const button = screen.getByRole('button');
  await user.click(button);
  
  const submenuItem = screen.getByText('Getting Started');
  submenuItem.focus();
  
  await user.keyboard('{Escape}');
  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(screen.queryByText('Getting Started')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d0153f and d1ba40c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Learnt from: codic-yeeshu
PR: OWASP/Nest#1444
File: frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-30T13:41:20.846Z
Learning: When implementing dropdown menus or similar interactive components, always include proper accessibility features: ARIA attributes (aria-expanded, aria-haspopup, aria-controls), keyboard navigation support (Enter, Space, Escape keys), and mechanisms to close dropdowns when clicking outside.
frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx (2)

Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: #1717
File: frontend/tests/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.

Learnt from: codic-yeeshu
PR: #1444
File: frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-30T13:41:20.846Z
Learning: When implementing dropdown menus or similar interactive components, always include proper accessibility features: ARIA attributes (aria-expanded, aria-haspopup, aria-controls), keyboard navigation support (Enter, Space, Escape keys), and mechanisms to close dropdowns when clicking outside.

🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx

[error] 251-251: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none

An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...

...Which is required to end this statement

(parse)

🔇 Additional comments (10)
frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx (10)

1-7: Well-structured imports and setup.

The imports are appropriate for a comprehensive React component test suite, including all necessary testing utilities and type definitions.


8-29: Effective mocking strategy for external dependencies.

The mocks properly isolate the component under test by replacing Next.js Link, FontAwesome icons, and utility functions with controlled implementations. This ensures tests focus on the component's behavior rather than external dependencies.


33-46: Comprehensive test data structure.

The mock data correctly represents the expected Link type structure with submenu items, providing good coverage for testing various scenarios.


52-75: Thorough basic rendering tests.

These tests properly verify the fundamental rendering behavior, checking for the presence of key elements and initial state conditions.


78-127: Good conditional rendering logic coverage.

The tests effectively verify dropdown open/close behavior and active styling based on pathname matching, which aligns with typical navigation component requirements.


215-235: Excellent outside click handling test.

This test properly verifies the click-outside-to-close functionality by creating additional DOM elements and testing the interaction, which is a critical UX feature for dropdown components.


461-514: Excellent accessibility testing coverage.

These tests thoroughly verify ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and accessibility relationships, which directly addresses the accessibility requirements mentioned in the retrieved learnings. The tests ensure proper implementation of aria-expanded, aria-haspopup, aria-controls, and decorative icon marking.


355-376: Good edge case handling for missing href.

The test correctly verifies fallback behavior when submenu items lack href properties, ensuring the component degrades gracefully.


285-333: Comprehensive state management testing.

These tests effectively verify internal state changes (chevron rotation) and independent state management for multiple dropdown instances, which are important for proper component behavior.


603-617: Excellent cleanup verification.

The test properly verifies that event listeners are cleaned up on component unmount, preventing potential memory leaks. This demonstrates good testing practices for components that add global event listeners.

Copy link
Collaborator

@kasya kasya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Please address CodeRabbit suggestions before requesting a review.
  2. You did not ran make check locally, otherwise these would have been updated and would not show up when running locally:
Screenshot 2025-07-27 at 10 31 21 AM 3. Test are currently fai.ing with this error. I'm not sure what you were trying to check in this one - it looks as if it's not finished. Screenshot 2025-07-27 at 10 33 21 AM

@TanushreeDattatreya24
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi could please guide me with the required changes?

@arkid15r
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi could please guide me with the required changes?

You need to follow the contributing guidelines and run make check for fixing the code issues locally. You need to update the PR w/ the generated changes.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@kasya
Copy link
Collaborator

kasya commented Jul 29, 2025

Hi could please guide me with the required changes?

@TanushreeDattatreya24 There were a lot of things that needed to be updated.
First, you always need to run make-check locally and make sure everything is green before creating a PR.
Once those are addressed - you need to check if tests are passing. That's the whole point of writing tests, right?

One of your tests missed part of the statement, as I mentioned above. You only had expect(screen.queryByText('Getting Started')).not.to. where it should be expect(screen.queryByText('Getting Started')).not.toBeInTheDocument(). I guess that's what you planned to check based on the description of the test.

That was causing failing tests. But once I fixed that - I found 2 more tests failing.
Each of those had to be looked at separately.

Last but not least, I noticed your test file was placed into the components folder. We do have a separate folder for tests - __tests__ in frontend directory.
I suggest you always start with reading and - more importantly - applying guidelines for any repo you want to contribute to. And pay attention to details like the structure of the project before jumping into actual coding.

I updated your PR with these changes. It should be good to go now 👌🏼

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1ba40c and 264eacc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/__tests__/unit/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: adithya-naik
PR: OWASP/Nest#1894
File: frontend/src/components/TopContributorsList.tsx:74-74
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T14:51:14.736Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, the maintainer adithya-naik prefers not to create separate components for code that's only used in two specific cases, following the YAGNI principle to avoid over-engineering when the duplication is limited and manageable.
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Learnt from: codic-yeeshu
PR: OWASP/Nest#1444
File: frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-30T13:41:20.846Z
Learning: When implementing dropdown menus or similar interactive components, always include proper accessibility features: ARIA attributes (aria-expanded, aria-haspopup, aria-controls), keyboard navigation support (Enter, Space, Escape keys), and mechanisms to close dropdowns when clicking outside.
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx (2)

Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: #1717
File: frontend/tests/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.

Learnt from: codic-yeeshu
PR: #1444
File: frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-30T13:41:20.846Z
Learning: When implementing dropdown menus or similar interactive components, always include proper accessibility features: ARIA attributes (aria-expanded, aria-haspopup, aria-controls), keyboard navigation support (Enter, Space, Escape keys), and mechanisms to close dropdowns when clicking outside.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
🔇 Additional comments (7)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/NavDropDown.test.tsx (7)

35-54: LGTM! Excellent test data structure.

The mock data properly represents the expected LinkType interface with realistic hierarchical navigation structure. The beforeEach cleanup ensures test isolation.


56-79: Solid basic rendering test coverage.

The basic rendering tests effectively verify component initialization and default state. Good coverage of essential UI elements.


183-286: Excellent event handling and accessibility coverage.

The comprehensive event handling tests cover all expected user interactions, including proper keyboard navigation support (Enter, Escape, Space keys). This aligns perfectly with accessibility best practices for dropdown components.


435-488: Outstanding accessibility test coverage!

The accessibility tests comprehensively cover all essential ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and proper semantic relationships. This directly addresses the project's emphasis on accessibility features for dropdown components, including proper ARIA labeling and keyboard support.


395-433: Thorough edge case and integration test coverage.

The edge case tests handle realistic scenarios (empty submenu, missing href, large datasets) with appropriate fallback behaviors. The integration tests ensure proper Next.js compatibility and memory leak prevention through event listener cleanup.

Also applies to: 543-586


81-131: CSS classes verified: tests match implementation

The tests’ expectations for font-bold, text-blue-800, and dark:text-white align exactly with the conditional className logic in frontend/src/components/NavDropDown.tsx. The conditional rendering and active‐state styling tests are accurate—no changes needed.


35-587: Unable to verify test results automatically due to missing package.json

The test command failed to locate a package.json at the repository root. Please manually confirm that the NavDropdown tests pass by running them from the correct directory.

Recommended steps:

  • Change into the frontend directory:
    cd frontend
  • Execute the tests for this component:
    npm test -- --testPathPattern=NavDropDown.test.tsx --verbose

@kasya kasya added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into OWASP:main with commit 0777ec4 Jul 29, 2025
24 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
@arkid15r arkid15r linked an issue Aug 11, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
10 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 19, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add tests for <NavDropDown> component

3 participants