Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is anyone using the GTFS-ride spec, and are there any sample datasets? #30

Open
mmorang opened this issue Aug 17, 2021 · 9 comments
Open

Comments

@mmorang
Copy link

mmorang commented Aug 17, 2021

Just a question: I stumbled upon this just now and was wondering if anyone is actively using this GTFS extension (looks like the repo hasn't been updated in a few years). Are there any sample datasets to play with? Can you give me a sense of the scale of adoption in the broader community?

@FrankThomas-ODOT
Copy link

FrankThomas-ODOT commented Aug 17, 2021 via email

@bbafford
Copy link

I work with an APC reporting package that I would be interested incorporating the GTFS-Ride into. Since I'll been following the project, I haven't seen an agency adopt it yet - it sounds like that may be changing. I'd be interested in getting involved in the project.

@FrankThomas-ODOT
Copy link

FrankThomas-ODOT commented Aug 18, 2021 via email

@bbafford
Copy link

Sure - [email protected] or by phone 410-241-4851

@portedav
Copy link

HI @mmorang,

We do have sample datasets compliant with the GTFS-ride standard that we can share with you. As Frank mentions, I'm currently out of the office with very poor internet access. Would it be OK if I get in touch with you again next Monday (8/23) to follow up on your request? BTW, do you work for a transit agency? or are you an independent developer?

Just a question: I stumbled upon this just now and was wondering if anyone is actively using this GTFS extension (looks like the repo hasn't been updated in a few years). Are there any sample datasets to play with? Can you give me a sense of the scale of adoption in the broader community?

@portedav
Copy link

Sure - [email protected] or by phone 410-241-4851

Hi @bbafford. As @FrankThomas-ODOT mentions, we're working with several Oregon transit agencies and we've also had conversations with a few CAD/AVL vendors about GTFS-ride. I'd be happy to give you a call next week to tell you more about our project and to answer any questions you may have. I'll send you an email later this week to coordinate a time to chat.

@FrankThomas-ODOT
Copy link

FrankThomas-ODOT commented Aug 18, 2021 via email

@mmorang
Copy link
Author

mmorang commented Aug 18, 2021

I am a product engineer at Esri, makers of the ArcGIS software. I design and develop tools for GIS analysis of and with public transit data, among other things.

We don't currently have any specific tools for working with transit ridership data, and this is largely because there is no standard format for this data. It is not feasible or viable for a large company like Esri to invest in creating tools within our core software products unless they can be used by a large number of customers. When the static GTFS standard was created and became widely adopted by agencies worldwide, it made sense to create tools within our suite of products that could ingest and work with transit schedule data. I would like to develop more tools to work with ridership data as well, and I am trying to assess whether this or any other standard is making any headway in gaining adoption.

I came across this project through a reference in a recent proposal for a new standard to include on-time performance metrics in a GTFS-like standard: http://bit.ly/gtfs-performance

Email: [email protected]
Feel free to reach out privately to schedule a meeting. It seems we could have a fruitful discussion. I'm in no hurry, so we can certainly wait until @PortaDav gets back from vacation.

@bbafford
Copy link

@portedav @FrankThomas-ODOT I have some time Wednesday 8/25 - 10AM EST to 3pm EST and Monday 8/23 in the afternoon 11AM-5PM EST

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants