-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AlternativeImage "comments" attribute for grayscale images #41
Comments
I have to check the idea and the "techniques" of this image transformation process. But given the file extension, I opt for |
The reasoning why ocropy does it like this is explained in the ocropy wiki.
|
|
It will be |
OK, so |
Yes!
…On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Konstantin Baierer < ***@***.***> wrote:
OK, so grayscale_normalized for comments of the resulting mets:file.
Should we also extend the step property in ocrd-tool.json to contain
preprocessing/optimization/grayscale_normalization in addition to
preprocessing/optimization/binarization?
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#41 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZeFEzefNsFDGFdCA60dYBDf7ciZrF4bks5tyaNdgaJpZM4T2-hY>
.
|
Is in v1.1.5, both the docs and schema. |
Such as ocropus'
nrm
. For other transformations we use the formbinarized
,dewarped
etc (c.f. #29). How do we name alternative images that are kind-of-binarized but with some gray at the edges of glyphs?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: