Skip to content

feat(skills): add social media content calendar - #78674

Closed
benbarclay wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
skill/social-media-content-calendar
Closed

benbarclay wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
skill/social-media-content-calendar

Conversation

@benbarclay

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Adds a concrete multi-platform content-calendar task. It turns campaign constraints and verified source material into channel-specific post briefs, copy, asset requirements, editorial status, approval batches, and provider-verified scheduling handoff.

Why this skill

A privacy-preserving Hermes Cloud fleet audit found strong repeated demand for task-level and app-level custom skills. This PR intentionally adds one bounded user task rather than a vague generic workflow or a new model tool. Provider-specific commands remain in existing connector skills.

Validation

  • Frontmatter, path/name, size, required sections, and credential-literal checks passed
  • tests/tools/test_skill_manager_tool.py: 45 passed
  • One new SKILL.md; no core or tool-schema changes

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

૮ >ﻌ< ა ci review

ran on 353bb97

all good!

@alt-glitch alt-glitch added type/feature New feature or request P3 Low — cosmetic, nice to have tool/skills Skills system (list, view, manage) labels Aug 4, 2026
@teknium1

teknium1 commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merged via PR #81942 with your commit cherry-picked onto current main — authorship preserved in git log. Shipped to optional-skills/creative/ (vertical audience) with polish per the skill authoring standards; the publish step now distinguishes provider-verified publication from scheduler handoff. Thanks!

@teknium1 teknium1 closed this Aug 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

P3 Low — cosmetic, nice to have tool/skills Skills system (list, view, manage) type/feature New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants