Skip to content

gi: fix buildInputs vs nativeBuildInputs #88980

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
nagisa wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

gi: fix buildInputs vs nativeBuildInputs #88980

nagisa wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@nagisa
Copy link
Contributor

@nagisa nagisa commented May 26, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Motivation for this change

Cross-compilation fails at configure stage otherwise. The cross-compile still does not succeed due to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/344 but that’s a separate issue entirely, and not something that can be easily fixed in nix.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@nagisa
gi: fix buildInputs vs nativeBuildInputs
8739893 
Cross-compilation fails at configure stage otherwise
@nagisa nagisa force-pushed the nagisa/buildinputs-gi branch from 293b513 to 8739893 Compare May 26, 2020 20:49
@nagisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

nagisa commented May 26, 2020

cc @Ericson2314

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from lovek323 May 26, 2020 20:57
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1001-2500 This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and should most likely target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-linux: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-linux: 2501-5000 This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and should target the staging branches. labels May 26, 2020
NickHu
NickHu reviewed May 26, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@NickHu NickHu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution!

Your changes all look reasonable, but is python really not supposed to be in buildInputs?

@nagisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

nagisa commented May 26, 2020

It might be necessary in both lists. That said it looks like #88222 is significantly more comprehensive, so closing in favour of that.

@nagisa nagisa closed this May 26, 2020
@nagisa nagisa deleted the nagisa/buildinputs-gi branch May 26, 2020 21:22
@Ericson2314
Copy link
Member

Ericson2314 commented May 27, 2020

I'll try to get that one done soon! Perhaps I shouldn't wait for https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/merge_requests/224

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@NickHu NickHu NickHu left review comments

@lovek323 lovek323 Awaiting requested review from lovek323

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1001-2500 This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and should most likely target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-linux: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-linux: 2501-5000 This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and should target the staging branches.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@nagisa @Ericson2314 @NickHu