-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Redo: add doc to ghc wrapper #77523
Redo: add doc to ghc wrapper #77523
Conversation
This reverts commit 93aabab. This reverts commit e915608. Based on change in master at d1bd0fb opened in NixOS#77442
This reverts commit 2395ac6. Added allowCollisions to fix the issue mentioned in NixOS#77442
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ symlinkJoin { | |||
# as a dedicated drv attribute, like `compiler-name` | |||
name = ghc.name + "-with-packages"; | |||
paths = paths ++ [ghc]; | |||
extraOutputsToInstall = ["doc"]; | |||
allowCollisions = true; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ignoring all file collisions in the ghc-wrapper feels like a hack. I'd rather not do this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that's due to buildEnv propagating the dependencies. Not sure how to turn that off. I'd actually prefer to set allowCollisions here regardless because that is what symlinkJoin does by default.
For instance, compare:
{ pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {} }:
pkgs.symlinkJoin {
name = "test";
paths = [
(pkgs.writeTextDir "/share/doc/uuid-types-1.0.3/html/uuid-types.haddock" "a")
(pkgs.writeTextDir "/share/doc/uuid-types-1.0.3/html/uuid-types.haddock" "b")
];
}
vs.
{ pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {} }:
pkgs.buildEnv {
name = "test";
paths = [
(pkgs.writeTextDir "/share/doc/uuid-types-1.0.3/html/uuid-types.haddock" "a")
(pkgs.writeTextDir "/share/doc/uuid-types-1.0.3/html/uuid-types.haddock" "b")
];
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer to treat collisions as an error. Because they usually are.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure how to avoid the regression then. The two packages given in the revert (cabal-plan & aeson), depend on two different versions of uuid-types:
$ nix-store -qR $(nix-build '<nixpkgs>' -A haskellPackages.cabal-plan) | grep uuid-types
/nix/store/vs6xvan33d5jmhaybwkddmdfljigm050-uuid-types-1.0.3-doc
/nix/store/pv27lwjz900idmyrf0hykhfr95a2yk44-uuid-types-1.0.3
$ nix-store -qR $(nix-build '<nixpkgs>' -A haskellPackages.aeson) | grep uuid-types
/nix/store/s9babnwzfpq4vj02p20070pxfc6zpilx-uuid-types-1.0.3-doc
/nix/store/ciqb2va7qbhzb0b0s5ak289pnks3bfvd-uuid-types-1.0.3
We could just add map (lib.getOutput "doc")
to the symlinkJoin, if that seems better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure how to remedy that issue. My problem with the "simple solution" is this: If different versions of a package exist, then these versions differ in the set of dependencies they link or flags they've been compiled with or something like that. Arguably, those differences may very well manifest in the API and in the generated documentation, so I would assume that those foobar.haddock
files might differ, too. Ignoring collisions means that we'll just pick a random one and link it into the generated store path. But that doesn't feel right. The foobar.haddock
file you'll get should be bundled in some obvious way with the library that it belongs to. This means that doc
hierarchy might need $out
baked into its directory name, maybe? Then there would be no more file collisions, because the *.haddock
files would no longer be ambiguous. Does that make sense?
Hello, I'm a bot and I thank you in the name of the community for your contributions. Nixpkgs is a busy repository, and unfortunately sometimes PRs get left behind for too long. Nevertheless, we'd like to help committers reach the PRs that are still important. This PR has had no activity for 180 days, and so I marked it as stale, but you can rest assured it will never be closed by a non-human. If this is still important to you and you'd like to remove the stale label, we ask that you leave a comment. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". But there's a bit more you can do: If you received an approval by an unprivileged maintainer and you are just waiting for a merge, you can @ mention someone with merge permissions and ask them to help. You might be able to find someone relevant by using Git blame on the relevant files, or via GitHub's web interface. You can see if someone's a member of the nixpkgs-committers team, by hovering with the mouse over their username on the web interface, or by searching them directly on the list. If your PR wasn't reviewed at all, it might help to find someone who's perhaps a user of the package or module you are changing, or alternatively, ask once more for a review by the maintainer of the package/module this is about. If you don't know any, you can use Git blame on the relevant files, or GitHub's web interface to find someone who touched the relevant files in the past. If your PR has had reviews and nevertheless got stale, make sure you've responded to all of the reviewer's requests / questions. Usually when PR authors show responsibility and dedication, reviewers (privileged or not) show dedication as well. If you've pushed a change, it's possible the reviewer wasn't notified about your push via email, so you can always officially request them for a review, or just @ mention them and say you've addressed their comments. Lastly, you can always ask for help at our Discourse Forum, or more specifically, at this thread or at #nixos' IRC channel. |
I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info |
* Will make it so that GHC.Paths's docdir NIX_GHC_DOCDIR points to an actual directory. * Documentation of all packages in the environment is available in `$out/share/doc`. This has previously been attempted in NixOS#76842 and reverted in NixOS#77442, since documentation can collide when the libraries wouldn't (thanks to the hash in the lib filename). `symlinkJoin` allows collision, so this solution should be akin to NixOS#77523 (minus `buildEnv`, one step at a time). `installDocumentation = false` restores the old behavior. Collision in the documentation only happen if the dependency closure of the given packages has more than one different derivation for the same library of the very same version. I'm personally inclined not to claim that our infrastructure does anything sensible in this case. Additionally, the documentation is likely largely the same in such cases (unless it is heavily patched). Resolves NixOS#150666. Resolves NixOS#76837. Closes NixOS#150968. Closes NixOS#77523.
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)