Conversation
988637a to
7c91e78
Compare
|
|
The linux build fails with: Which seems to me to mean that it's somehow a nix tooling problem. |
This release adds the ability to also get the correct version of helm
|
After a rebase I can now reproduce this outside of nixpkgs-reveiw, I'll investigate and file bugs. I'm still pretty confident that this is an upstream problem and not a fault of this PR. |
|
see #461884 for debugging of the build failure |
eclairevoyant
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved automatically following the successful run of nixpkgs-review.
|
|
@eclairevoyant Ok, so it's pretty likely that this is an issue with my rosetta based linux builder. Thanks! |
|
yes, that linux builder was the reason, see fix at #463106 |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/2660 |
This release adds the ability to also get the correct version of the helm binary as well. Now both kubectl as well as helm use the version that is best suited for the cluster at hand, auto switching to the latest compatible release if available.
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.