Skip to content

aggregateModules: auto-extract modules output from kernel derivations#439178

Closed
Mic92 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
Mic92:aggregate-modules
Closed

aggregateModules: auto-extract modules output from kernel derivations#439178
Mic92 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
Mic92:aggregate-modules

Conversation

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Sep 1, 2025

Since #423933
nixpkgs kernel have a seperate "modules" output for kernel.
This check now acts similar to lib.getBin/lib.getLib etc.

Things done

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

Since NixOS#423933
nixpkgs kernel have a seperate "modules" output for kernel.
This check now acts similar to lib.getBin/lib.getLib etc.
@Mic92 Mic92 force-pushed the aggregate-modules branch from e94240f to d21714d Compare September 1, 2025 13:03
Mic92 added a commit to nix-community/disko that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
This is a hotfix that could be reverted if we get:

NixOS/nixpkgs#439178

in.
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. labels Sep 1, 2025
@Mic92 Mic92 marked this pull request as draft September 1, 2025 13:16
Mic92 added a commit to nix-community/disko that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
This is a hotfix that could be reverted if we get:

NixOS/nixpkgs#439178

in.
@Mic92
Copy link
Member Author

Mic92 commented Sep 1, 2025

Just using modules doesn't seem to be enough in our use case. Both outputs are required.

@Mic92 Mic92 closed this Sep 1, 2025
@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the aggregate-modules branch September 1, 2025 13:21
Mic92 added a commit to nix-community/disko that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
This is a hotfix that could be reverted if we get:

NixOS/nixpkgs#439178

in.
Mic92 added a commit to nix-community/disko that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
This is a hotfix that could be reverted if we get:

NixOS/nixpkgs#439178

in.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to nix-community/disko that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
This is a hotfix that could be reverted if we get:

NixOS/nixpkgs#439178

in.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments