Skip to content

x86info: drop#438089

Closed
qzylinra wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
qzylinra:x86info
Closed

x86info: drop#438089
qzylinra wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
qzylinra:x86info

Conversation

@qzylinra
Copy link
Contributor

This has basically been abandoned and is no longer maintained; FreeBSD has already removed the package. kernelslacker/x86info#15

Things done

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

This has basically been abandoned and is no longer maintained; FreeBSD has already removed the package. kernelslacker/x86info#15
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. labels Aug 29, 2025
@ofborg ofborg bot added the ofborg-internal-error Ofborg encountered an error label Sep 1, 2025
@nix-owners nix-owners bot requested a review from jcumming September 1, 2025 10:28
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot removed the 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. label Sep 1, 2025
Copy link
Member

@wegank wegank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't even work on my 10-year-old x86_64 machine...

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. label Sep 2, 2025
@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Seems to work for me:

% /nix/store/shlxw24p2iqpz7pw5ihyv9ixy3avxn2x-x86info-0-unstable-2021-08-07/bin/x86info
x86info 2025-07-26
Found 32 identical CPUs
Extended Family: 8 Extended Model: 7 Family: 15 Model: 113 Stepping: 0
CPU Model (x86info's best guess): Unknown CPU 0x870f10
Processor name string (BIOS programmed): AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core Processor

Monitor/Mwait: min/max line size 64/64, ecx bit 0 support, enumeration extension
SVM: revision 1, 32768 ASIDs, np, lbrVirt, SVMLock, NRIPSave, TscRateMsr, VmcbClean, FlushByAsid, DecodeAssists, PauseFilter, PauseFilterThreshold
Address Size: 48 bits virtual, 48 bits physical
The physical package has 32 of 128 possible cores implemented.
 running at an estimated 3.50GHz

Is it useful? I don't know, but it seems to work.

@qzylinra qzylinra closed this Sep 3, 2025
@qzylinra qzylinra deleted the x86info branch September 3, 2025 06:41
@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure why you're closing that immediately. I would expect this to stay open for ~a week to give the maintainer @jcumming time to react and say something about it.

@wegank
Copy link
Member

wegank commented Sep 3, 2025

Seems to work for me:

% /nix/store/shlxw24p2iqpz7pw5ihyv9ixy3avxn2x-x86info-0-unstable-2021-08-07/bin/x86info
x86info 2025-07-26
Found 32 identical CPUs
Extended Family: 8 Extended Model: 7 Family: 15 Model: 113 Stepping: 0
CPU Model (x86info's best guess): Unknown CPU 0x870f10
Processor name string (BIOS programmed): AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core Processor

Monitor/Mwait: min/max line size 64/64, ecx bit 0 support, enumeration extension
SVM: revision 1, 32768 ASIDs, np, lbrVirt, SVMLock, NRIPSave, TscRateMsr, VmcbClean, FlushByAsid, DecodeAssists, PauseFilter, PauseFilterThreshold
Address Size: 48 bits virtual, 48 bits physical
The physical package has 32 of 128 possible cores implemented.
 running at an estimated 3.50GHz

Is it useful? I don't know, but it seems to work.

My i7-4790K was identified as a Xeon E3. I guess Unknown CPU does work better here...

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

My i7-4790K was identified as a Xeon E3. I guess Unknown CPU does work better here...

Right. "Unknown" is also what the upstream issue says as the reported problem. Reporting something else entirely... seems really broken, indeed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. ofborg-internal-error Ofborg encountered an error

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants