-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.2k
ci/eval/compare: don't treat renames as rebuilds #431448
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
wolfgangwalther
merged 1 commit into
NixOS:master
from
wolfgangwalther:ci-renamed-rebuilds
Aug 6, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -18,13 +18,20 @@ let | |
| added: [ <keys only in the second object> ], | ||
| removed: [ <keys only in the first object> ], | ||
| changed: [ <keys with different values between the two objects> ], | ||
| rebuilds: [ <keys in the second object with values not present at all in first object> ], | ||
| } | ||
| */ | ||
| diff = | ||
| old: new: | ||
| let | ||
| filterKeys = cond: attrs: lib.attrNames (lib.filterAttrs cond attrs); | ||
| oldOutputs = lib.pipe old [ | ||
| (lib.mapAttrsToList (_: lib.attrValues)) | ||
| lib.concatLists | ||
| (lib.flip lib.genAttrs (_: true)) | ||
|
Comment on lines
+29
to
+31
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. My mind tells me there's an opportunity to use It also tells me that there's something in |
||
| ]; | ||
| in | ||
| old: new: { | ||
| { | ||
| added = filterKeys (n: _: !(old ? ${n})) new; | ||
| removed = filterKeys (n: _: !(new ? ${n})) old; | ||
| changed = filterKeys ( | ||
|
|
@@ -35,6 +42,16 @@ let | |
| # Filter out attributes that are the same as the new value | ||
| && (v != (new.${n})) | ||
| ) old; | ||
| # A "rebuild" is every attrpath ... | ||
| rebuilds = filterKeys ( | ||
| _: pkg: | ||
| # ... that has at least one output ... | ||
| lib.any ( | ||
| output: | ||
| # ... which has not been built in "old" already. | ||
| !(oldOutputs ? ${output}) | ||
| ) (lib.attrValues pkg) | ||
| ) new; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| getAttrs = | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can be computed without respect to the
newand hence can be in a let block before thenew.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
filterKeyswas before the arguments before. Does any of this make a difference if thisdifffunction is only ever called exactly once?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since
filterKeysis a function itself, I suspect it doesn't matter.