Skip to content

Revert "workflows/labels: manage stale & merge conflict labels"#419574

Merged
wolfgangwalther merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
revert-419481-ci-labels-with-search
Jun 24, 2025
Merged

Revert "workflows/labels: manage stale & merge conflict labels"#419574
wolfgangwalther merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
revert-419481-ci-labels-with-search

Conversation

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #419481, because of #419481 (comment).

Copy link
Contributor

@MattSturgeon MattSturgeon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the revert commit message reference the commit/PR?

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would be additional effort, since I created the revert with the GitHub UI's "revert" button and don't have the branch locally, yet.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. 6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions 6.topic: policy discussion Discuss policies to work in and around Nixpkgs backport release-24.11 labels Jun 24, 2025
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther merged commit 5ec9d25 into master Jun 24, 2025
48 of 51 checks passed
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther deleted the revert-419481-ci-labels-with-search branch June 24, 2025 14:08
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Jun 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions 6.topic: policy discussion Discuss policies to work in and around Nixpkgs 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants