Conversation
fa791b3 to
c7a6170
Compare
pkgs/by-name/na/nano/package.nix
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, I mean whether this should be isDarwin or isClang
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, my bad. This should be isDarwin as the failures happen specifically on those platforms. Though, I haven't tested clang
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be
isDarwinas the failures happen specifically on those platforms.
It's not enough. We have some packages that need to be built with clang, and some attempts are using clang as the default compiler. I hope we can always try to find the root cause instead of just turning off the error check when it appears.
66907dc to
c7a6170
Compare
|
https://fossies.org/diffs/gettext/0.23_vs_0.23.1/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib/openat-die.c-diff.html This is probably fixing the issue. As a workaround, |
Fixes an issue with `format string is not a string literal` breaking nano on Darwin. https://hydra.nixos.org/build/300187289/nixlog/1
c7a6170 to
acfc0b3
Compare
|
I've turned on |
|
Still don't know why this is popping up. Since 25.05,
Why nano builds succeeded on 25.05? |
|
What really confuses me is why it broke now, it worked fine a week ago.. |
|
And last staging-next PR #412425 hasn't been merged yet |
|
My guess would be that |
|
|
Yes, it's bundled. |
#417495
Fixes an issue with
format string is not a string literalbreaking nano on Darwin.https://hydra.nixos.org/build/300187289/nixlog/1
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.