Conversation
|
Builds and runs on |
|
@dtomvan Just usual procedure while nixpkgs-review is still running. My computer is quite slow, and Im currently AFK, so if you manage to run it for Linux (make sure to skip the home-assistant packages, see previous uv PRs for the correct command), then I can mark it as ready for review. |
|
So far I have a DetailsEdit: passed the second time, might be flaky |
|
|
Re-running CI due to a odd failure fixed in #416448 |
|
Sorry, forgot to post the report. Doing that now. Will probably be relevant as I did get some errors. Nevermind, |
|
dtomvan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The homeassistant failure I got wasn't related, we can look at that another time
|
Changelog: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0713
Noteworthy is the update to
uv-build, which now supports namespace packages.Quoting one of the maintainer's comments in the "Build Backend Tracking Issue" of astral-sh/uv:
Perhaps we will start to see packages depending on uv-build in nixpkgs soon!I take it back, the first package using uv-build already here!
python3Packages.ffmpyuses it since #413774CC @GaetanLepage
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.