Skip to content

nano: 8.4 -> 8.5#416220

Merged
Ma27 merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
trofi:nano-update
Jun 13, 2025
Merged

nano: 8.4 -> 8.5#416220
Ma27 merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
trofi:nano-update

Conversation

@trofi
Copy link
Contributor

@trofi trofi commented Jun 12, 2025

Changes: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2025-06/msg00003.html

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Nixpkgs 25.11 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Nixpkgs Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • NixOS 25.11 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 NixOS Release notes)
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other contributing documentation in corresponding paths.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 This PR causes between 11 and 100 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500 This PR causes between 101 and 500 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Jun 12, 2025
@SigmaSquadron
Copy link
Contributor

Are the keybind changes considered breaking? IMO that's minor enough to not prevent a backport.

@Ma27
Copy link
Member

Ma27 commented Jun 13, 2025

Are the keybind changes considered breaking? IMO that's minor enough to not prevent a backport.

The fact that they recommend a manual upgrade step (reverse your filepos history) is an indication for a no, but then again, I'm not sure if doing backports for nano is actually worth it.

@Ma27 Ma27 merged commit 54acbc5 into NixOS:master Jun 13, 2025
18 of 20 checks passed
@trofi trofi deleted the nano-update branch June 13, 2025 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 This PR causes between 11 and 100 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500 This PR causes between 101 and 500 packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants