nixos/udev: verify udev rules with udevadm

[r-vdp]

Things done

Re-apply of #404323, but this time I made sure that the installer tests still pass

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[r-vdp]

@ofborg test installer-simple

[K900]

@ofborg test installer.simple

[r-vdp]

@ofborg test installer.simpleUefiSystemdBoot

[r-vdp]

The simple test succeeded on ofborg (but it only runs on x86_64)

[LordGrimmauld]

Currently going through all packages with udev rules, i found another broken package:

• alsa-utils

(might update this list as i find more)

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/udev-regression-recommended-way-for-udev-rules/73061/3