tree-sitter-grammars: update all#402457
Closed
kimburgess wants to merge 21 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100
This was referenced Apr 28, 2025
Member
|
Member
|
There are version mismatches in some of the python tree sitter grammars, it seems: |
Member
Author
|
This PR can be ignored. I'm sketching out a refactor to propose some changes to how these grammars are defined. This includes integrating Edit: PR with proposed changes #408414 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates all tree-sitter grammars specified in pkgs/development/tools/parsing/tree-sitter/update.nix.
When adding tree-sitter-grammars.tree-sitter-netlinx the update script flagged changes available for a number of other listed parsers. Some of these appear to gave not been updated for some time. The existence of past bulk update PRs also appears to indicate the process may not currently be automated.
Note: parser updates have not been tested or validated in any form. No maintainers are listed against any of these packages so would encourage any conversation or questions about suitability of this before merge by those more familiar with this area of Nixpkgs.
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.