python3Packages.flasgger: fix build#391322
Conversation
6620964 updated the version without updating the hash. Also, both patches appear to be already applied.
630aa47 to
9425abc
Compare
|
|
|
Actually, what is the policy for changes like this? It is a mass-rebuild, but the current state on So, does this go to |
|
After some though, I decided to assume it should be |
|
i get hit by this. any news? |
|
Also just got hit by this. Would be excellent to get it merged. |
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| patches = [ | ||
| (fetchpatch { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
fetchpatch should have been removed from inputs (done in #438471)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ideally CI would give that feedback. Wondering if deadnix is ready for that.
@NixOS/nixpkgs-ci
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I polished up my local experimentation branch for adding nixf-diagnose to treefmt in #438559. This would be the way forward, I think.
6620964 updated the version without updating the hash and
patches.