Conversation
ff162e7 to
d7db841
Compare
3715bdb to
3bd3da6
Compare
|
@NixOS/nix-formatting the formatting check fails if formatted with |
|
A new fetcher has been introduced and its usage is encouraged: #349360. |
the docs say to use that new fetcher only if cargo lock has git dependencies:
but if you say I should use that.. does simply adding |
|
Hmm, my understanding was that it avoiding us vendoring the I'll defer to more knowledgeable Rust maintainers to weight in the. |
pkgs/by-name/ne/neohtop/package.nix
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why not use cargoHash and get rid of the lockfile?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
because this does not work (cargo cannot find reqwest and the build fails) I think its related to:
https://github.com/HannesGitH/nixpkgs/blob/c43b2b1ea412767dd01e4354f4ca05ff942df4e4/pkgs/by-name/su/surrealist/package.nix#L52-L57
FliegendeWurst
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A meta attribute is required
FliegendeWurst
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you need to include openssl in buildInputs
why? it builds and runs as it currently is |
Not on Linux (see ofborg) |
|
|
It is a little hidden because it will mark a build failure as "neutral". |
pkgs/by-name/ne/neohtop/package.nix
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the normal way to do this is simply to copy the entire .app folder to $out(maybe share)?
|
thanks for your feedback, ill hopefully be able to integrate that tomorrow! |
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.