haskell.packages.ghc98.ghc-lib{,-parser}: 9.8.2.20240223 -> 9.8.3.20241022

[mpscholten]

The new version of ghc-lib was released recently. With this we should be able to switch to ghc983 in nixpkgs

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[maralorn]

Yes, great. We are currently waiting on staging-next getting merged into master so that we can do our next round of bumps.

[mpscholten]

As staging-next has not been merged into master yet, could we merge this PR into staging-next and then switch to GHC 9.8.3 in staging-next? This way we would get to use 9.83. faster :)

[maralorn]

Good question. I don’t know. I have to say I am not super in a rush with this. I am very certain that we will get this in for the next release.

@sternenseemann wdyt?

[maralorn]

This PR edits the autogenerated hackage-packages.nix file manually. But I think it’s obsoleted by the auto-update anyway.

[sternenseemann]

Now that I've done the proper bump independently, I've also discovered that this change wouldn't even be enough to successfully compile HLS with GHC 9.8.3.

[mpscholten]

Thanks for looking into this 👍 Yes i haven't checked that HLS actually compiles after ghc-lib-parser was compiling.