Skip to content

nixos/mpd: Add a settings option per RFC42#322766

Closed
evyatark2 wants to merge 9 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
evyatark2:mpd-settings
Closed

nixos/mpd: Add a settings option per RFC42#322766
evyatark2 wants to merge 9 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
evyatark2:mpd-settings

Conversation

@evyatark2
Copy link

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` labels Jun 26, 2024
@NixOSInfra NixOSInfra added the 12.first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle! label Jun 26, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Jun 27, 2024
@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Sep 27, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Dec 7, 2024
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
{ config, lib, pkgs, ... }:

with lib;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
with lib;
inherit (lib) isList isAttrs isBool;

#208242
Probably you need to inherit even more stuff from lib.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Apr 2, 2025
@FliegendeWurst
Copy link
Member

There is a merge conflict due to treewide reformatting. See #395247

@ofborg ofborg bot removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Apr 3, 2025
@evyatark2
Copy link
Author

evyatark2 commented Apr 3, 2025

@FliegendeWurst
Done.

@FliegendeWurst
Copy link
Member

cc mpd maintainers: @astsmtl @tobim

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Jul 27, 2025
@doronbehar
Copy link
Contributor

There are too many merge commits here, and there's merge conflict. I have applied RFC 42 more thoroughly in:

@doronbehar
Copy link
Contributor

Done in #456989 .

@doronbehar doronbehar closed this Jan 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle!

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants