haskellPackages.cbor-tool: Unbroken

[mrkline]

Description of changes

cbor-tool builds again - it was fixed against more recent GHCs in November:
well-typed/cborg@f910b12

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[mrkline]

pkgs/development/haskell-modules/hackage-packages.nix needs to be updated accordingly, but I wasn't sure if that should be part of this PR as well.

[maralorn]

pkgs/development/haskell-modules/hackage-packages.nix needs to be updated accordingly, but I wasn't sure if that should be part of this PR as well.

This is funny, nearly the same PR twice. Yeah, updating that file would be great. Please see #307815 where I just left complete instructions.

[mrkline]

Heh, coworkers chatting on Slack but not being clear on who'd send the PR. Sorry for any extra noise there. 😅

hackage-packages.nix updated!

[maralorn]

Still the wrong target branch.