haskellPackages.kmonad: mark as broken on darwin

[slotThe]

Description of changes

Related: #304640

I don't have access to MacOS, so I don't know how to actually test this (help? :)), but the error seemed obvious enough.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[sternenseemann]

Darwin specific overrides should go to configuration-darwin.nix which is unconditionally applied there.

[sternenseemann]

This change does appear to result in a linker failure on darwin.

[slotThe]

Well that's very confusing… I suppose wrt #304640 we can just mark this package as broken on darwin for the time being.

[slotThe]

@sternenseemann since I don't really have a way to test this, the sanest solution seems to be to just mark the package as broken on darwin for now.

[maralorn]

wfm

[sternenseemann]

Technically, it supports darwin… we just haven't set it up right.

[maralorn]

Yeah, the old semantic struggle that we can’t trivially mark packages broken based on platform …