ghostscript: 10.02.1 -> 10.03.1

[afh]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[afh]

Friendly ping to @viric on this 🙂

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/1673

[afh]

Thanks for reviewing and merging this, @veprbl, very much appreciated! 🙏

With the NixOS 24.05 in the making is there anything regarding backporting that needs to be done?

[github-actions]

Successfully created backport PR for staging-24.05:

• [Backport staging-24.05] ghostscript: 10.02.1 -> 10.03.1 #314266

[veprbl]

With the NixOS 24.05 in the making is there anything regarding backporting that needs to be done?

As we are way past all branch offs, this needs a backport.