luaPackages: update on 2024-04-12#294057
Conversation
|
Result of 18 packages marked as broken and skipped:
53 packages failed to build:
1953 packages built:
|
|
Result of 18 packages marked as broken and skipped:
53 packages failed to build:
1950 packages built:
|
4538bf6 to
024bb6d
Compare
024bb6d to
e80fc59
Compare
e80fc59 to
6ecf62d
Compare
|
|
|
Result of 18 packages marked as broken and skipped:
10 packages failed to build:
2026 packages built:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great to see more people joining in on maintaining this 😄
Normally, PRs with such a large amount of rebuilds should target the staging branch.
I don't know if that applies to luaPackages/vimPlugins too, though. @teto what do you think?
6ecf62d to
056313c
Compare
|
Result of 18 packages marked as broken and skipped:
2042 packages built:
|
|
Result of 18 packages marked as broken and skipped:
2039 packages built:
|
|
Result of 21 packages marked as broken and skipped:
28 packages failed to build:
1973 packages built:
|
|
Result of 21 packages marked as broken and skipped:
31 packages failed to build:
1970 packages built:
|
056313c to
7635fdb
Compare
9d4c4a5 to
5cce49a
Compare
|
Result of 19 packages marked as broken and skipped:
2087 packages built:
|
|
ofborg mentions: I tried a nixpkgs-review from a server which concluded the same as ofborg. If I try a I get the hash currently used but not liked by ofborg (luarocks-nix uses nix-prefetch-url under the hood so that makes sense). I tried nix-prefetch-url --unpack but once translated to sri ( |
|
@ofborg build lua52Packages.dkjson.src lua52Packages.dkjson |
1 similar comment
|
@ofborg build lua52Packages.dkjson.src lua52Packages.dkjson |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Uh, are you sure about this part?
3b40b23 to
f5d473e
Compare
f5d473e to
1c8e4a0
Compare
|
Result of 19 packages marked as broken and skipped:
5 packages failed to build:
2081 packages built:
|
|
According to @GaetanLepage knot already breaks on staging so merging. Thanks for the huge work, I have a bunch of PR that I need to submit to add transitive lua dependencies support to neovim plugins and this will make regenerating the lua set a lot easier ! |
|
Ok, I have definitely not noticed. Do you want me to address it on this branch ? |
|
It's in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You sure this would work? @GaetanLepage
Just removing the version bound doesn't seem like a good idea to me...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, I have forgot to answer you. Is this still an issue ?
Description of changes
Update the lua packages. Generated using the
luarocks-packages-updaterscript.Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.