rmg: init at 0.5.4

[slam-bert]

Description of changes

Adds Rosalie's Mupen GUI to nixpkgs

NOTE: This project ships it's own mupen64plus-core instead of using the one that's already been packaged. It also comes
with plugins (such as GLideN64) that are compiled during the build phase.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

I've tested the program by changing plugins and playing through small chunks of some games.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[bachp]

@slam-bert Thanks for the contribution. Two remarks from my side:

Could you sqash your two commits into one and also use rmg: init at 0.5.4 as the commit message.

Also just adding a default.nix for the package to where you added it doesn't make it available in nixpkgs. You either have to make an entry in all-packages.nix. Or even better move it to the by-name hirarchy. This is quite new and there is is enough to just add it as you did. Check the README for where exactly to put it.

[slam-bert]

Hello @bachp!

I wasn't able to squash the commits (much to my frustration), so I instead decided to rollback my fork to before the commits and create a new commit. I made sure to move the default.nix file to by-name, as you recommended.

EDIT: I've also updated the default.nix file to include mainProgram and updated platform to platforms.linux.

If any other changes are needed, please let me know!

[bachp]

@slam-bert I forgot that in the by-name tree the file needs to be named package.nix instead of default.nix. That's why the CI is failing.

[slam-bert]

@bachp Thanks for bringing that to my attention! I renamed default.nix to package.nix and cleaned up the code a bit.

[slam-bert]

@ofborg build rmg

[slam-bert]

@bachp ofborg has rmg.passthru.tests on aarch64-darwin and rmg on aarch64-darwinrunning for some reason, even though I marked the platforms in meta as platforms.linux. When I visited the ofborg web interface, I found that the two checks seem to be stuck on Subscribing to "nixos/nixpkgs.279958".... Is there a way to fix this?