dnf-plugins-core: init at 4.4.3#272997
Conversation
SuperSandro2000
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please follow the contributing guide when naming your commits.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| mkdir -p $out | |
| cp -R ${dnf4-unwrapped}/* $out/ | |
| mkdir -p $py | |
| cp -R ${dnf4-unwrapped.py}/* $py/ | |
| mkdir -p $man | |
| cp -R ${dnf4-unwrapped.man}/* $man/ | |
| mkdir -p $out $py $man | |
| cp -R ${dnf4-unwrapped}/* $out/ | |
| cp -R ${dnf4-unwrapped.py}/* $py/ | |
| cp -R ${dnf4-unwrapped.man}/* $man/ |
also we should symlink instead
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I couldn't get this running with symlinks, it keeps failing with permission errors:
post-installation fixup
chmod: changing permissions of '/nix/store/9mvni7wqni9q6nv5cff32w9njz679xl8-dnf4-4.18.2': Operation not permitted
chmod: changing permissions of '/nix/store/9mvni7wqni9q6nv5cff32w9njz679xl8-dnf4-4.18.2/lib': Operation not permitted
chmod: changing permissions of '/nix/store/9mvni7wqni9q6nv5cff32w9njz679xl8-dnf4-4.18.2/lib/systemd': Operation not permitted
chmod: changing permissions of '/nix/store/9mvni7wqni9q6nv5cff32w9njz679xl8-dnf4-4.18.2/lib/systemd/system': Operation not permitted
....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
then we keep the cp for now unless someone else finds a good solution
8738b4f to
63f9d2e
Compare
|
Thanks for your review.
I'm sorry, I don't get what's wrong with the name of my commit, could you please give me a hint? |
First of all, I should revisit my reply template and add the link to the headline directly. 😅 Also I've just noticed that it kinda turned into a linktree and I also couldn't find what I was searching for on the fast but essentially each package should get it's own commit and that is written somewhere there 😂 |
SuperSandro2000
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
other than one commit for each package, I don't have immediate feedback right now.
611b6ac to
aadedbf
Compare
aadedbf to
fcd4e55
Compare
fcd4e55 to
fa5e2a5
Compare
malt3
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested successfully on Linux amd64
pbsds
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Result of nixpkgs-review pr 272997 run on x86_64-linux 1
6 packages built:
- python310Packages.dnf4
- python310Packages.dnf4.man
- python310Packages.dnf4.py
- python311Packages.dnf4
- python311Packages.dnf4.man
- python311Packages.dnf4.py
Weird, I had to build python3Packages.dnf-plugins-core and dnf4 manually. Did ofborg do a booboo?
Looks mostly good to me, just a nit.
fa5e2a5 to
d3ecf90
Compare
|
Result of 6 packages built:
LGTM, but the ofborg eval is still weird... @ofborg build python310Packages.dnf4 python310Packages.dnf4.passthru.tests python311Packages.dnf4 python311Packages.dnf4.passthru.tests python310Packages.dnf-plugins-core python310Packages.dnf-plugins-core.passthru.tests python311Packages.dnf-plugins-core python311Packages.dnf-plugins-core.passthru.tests dnf4 dnf4.passthru.tests |
Yes, it's indeed a bit weird. But I'm not sure what to do about it. |
|
nixpkgs-review would discover it if it didn't use the ofborg eval Should also show up on search.nixos.com. |
Description of changes
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.