-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
logseq: 0.9.20 -> 0.10.0 #272126
logseq: 0.9.20 -> 0.10.0 #272126
Conversation
Result of 1 package built:
|
I'm not able to immediately confirm the update is working as intended. I haven't bisected it further, but my NixOS environment broke for running Logseq somewhere between 2023-11-24 and 2023-12-01, and so my NixOS build using the I'll take it out of draft in case a reviewer is not affected by my issues. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It works correctly for me (on sway, both wayland and xwayland).
This could be related to #244742 |
That definitely sounds plausible, thanks very much for the pointer! 🍻 |
I deleted the files in (I am on 0.9.20 so the bug is not related to 0.10.0) |
Description of changes
https://github.com/logseq/logseq/releases/tag/0.10.0
Things done
This was my first time trying out
nixpkgs-update
- please let me know if there are any mistakes or gotchas I should be aware of, so I can do better going forward.nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.