Skip to content

arangodb_3_10: init at 3.10.5.2#255012

Closed
jsoo1 wants to merge 2 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
awakesecurity:arango-versioned
Closed

arangodb_3_10: init at 3.10.5.2#255012
jsoo1 wants to merge 2 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
awakesecurity:arango-versioned

Conversation

@jsoo1
Copy link
Contributor

@jsoo1 jsoo1 commented Sep 13, 2023

Alias arangodb to suffixed attribute.

Addresses #254866

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ofborg ofborg bot added the 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package label Sep 13, 2023
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from flosse September 13, 2023 21:33
@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by a maintainer of all the package it changes. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. labels Sep 13, 2023
@wegank wegank added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Mar 19, 2024
@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Nov 9, 2024
@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Nov 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merge conflict, please rebase.

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. label Dec 15, 2024
@wegank wegank added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jan 2, 2025
@donovanglover donovanglover marked this pull request as draft February 8, 2025 01:44
@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Feb 8, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jun 25, 2025
@emilazy
Copy link
Member

emilazy commented Aug 9, 2025

@jsoo1 Are you still interested in maintaining ArangoDB in Nixpkgs? I noticed we’re on a version from over two years ago that pins a GCC that has been EOL for as long.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Aug 9, 2025
@jsoo1
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsoo1 commented Aug 10, 2025

@emilazy let me find out.

@jsoo1
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsoo1 commented Aug 11, 2025

@emilazy looks like we don't need it. So I don't think I should be maintainer anymore

@emilazy
Copy link
Member

emilazy commented Aug 11, 2025

Thanks for confirming! I’ll probably proceed with dropping the package then, as it seems there’s not much interest in keeping it updated.

@emilazy emilazy closed this Aug 11, 2025
@VlaDexa
Copy link
Contributor

VlaDexa commented Aug 14, 2025

Can I maintain it for now?

@emilazy
Copy link
Member

emilazy commented Aug 14, 2025

@VlaDexa If the latest version builds with a supported version of GCC (13, 14, or 15), I’d be happy to review a PR packaging it. Note that since this PR was opened in response to a request for versioned attributes, we’d probably want to introduce it with a version suffix, and dropping the current version should not get in the way of packaging the newer one.

@emilazy emilazy mentioned this pull request Aug 19, 2025
13 tasks
emilazy added a commit to emilazy/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
This requires an EOL GCC to build. The version is over two years
old; the latest version is 3.12.5.2. The listed package maintainer
[no longer uses the package]. If another version is packaged that
builds with a supported compiler, this can be re‐added; per the
[request from 2023] to restore versioned suffixes, it should likely
not be upgraded in place anyway, to avoid unexpected data migrations.

[no longer uses the package]: <NixOS#255012 (comment)>
[request from 2023]: <NixOS#254866>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by a maintainer of all the package it changes. 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants