python310Packages.cryptography: 40.0.1 -> 41.0.1#238965
python310Packages.cryptography: 40.0.1 -> 41.0.1#238965SuperSandro2000 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:stagingfrom
Conversation
|
Can I help move this along somehow? |
49b7c90 to
5c29fda
Compare
Nah, we just need to rebase this. @ofborg build python310Packages.cryptography python311Packages.cryptography |
|
I have now used this to build/test/package a recent version of Tahoe-LAFS against pyOpenSSL 23.2.0 (which requires cryptography >=41, <42). I encountered one new test failure in Twisted (twisted/twisted#11892) which I ended up patching in a skip for (it looks like a test bug to me, but it's also not entirely trivial to make sense of) and I had to upgrade service-identity to 23.1.0 to address an x509 parsing test failure that looks related to cryptography to me. With Twisted and service-identity thus adjusted, I had success with the cryptography in this PR on Python 3.8, Python 3.9, and Python 3.10. |
Upstream confirms this is a bug in Twisted's test suite which has already been fixed (but not released) - twisted/twisted#11878 |
|
depends on #238006 |
5c29fda to
fe46838
Compare
|
Included in #244135 |
Description of changes
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)