Skip to content

Comments

fish: fix build with Darwin sandbox enabled#234119

Merged
cole-h merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
reckenrode:fish-darwin-sandbox
Jun 9, 2023
Merged

fish: fix build with Darwin sandbox enabled#234119
cole-h merged 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
reckenrode:fish-darwin-sandbox

Conversation

@reckenrode
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

fish’s test suite has numerous failures when run on a Darwin machine with the sandbox enabled. The sandbox profile allows the test suite to run successfully.

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ofborg ofborg bot added the 6.topic: darwin Running or building packages on Darwin label May 26, 2023
@ofborg ofborg bot requested review from cole-h, rapenne-s and winterqt May 26, 2023 02:59
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 This PR causes between 11 and 100 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. labels May 26, 2023
Copy link
Member

@winterqt winterqt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't know sandboxProfile worked with sandbox = true (as opposed to relaxed)!

@reckenrode
Copy link
Contributor Author

I didn't know sandboxProfile worked with sandbox = true (as opposed to relaxed)!

I don’ think it does. I’m using sandbox = relaxed. I guess I’ve gotten lazy about updating the message to reflect that I’m using relaxed instead of true. 😅

@winterqt
Copy link
Member

I said that because it worked fine with my configuration, where it is true... odd.

@reckenrode
Copy link
Contributor Author

I said that because it worked fine with my configuration, where it is true... odd.

Huh. That is odd.

@mweinelt mweinelt added 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages. labels Jun 2, 2023
Copy link
Member

@cole-h cole-h left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! I also tested with sandbox = true (before and after this commit) and it does indeed fix it. (Built natively before and after on aarch64-darwin, but only after through Rosetta for x86_64-darwin.)

Maybe sandboxProfile is always intended to be allowed 🤷

@cole-h cole-h merged commit dad6320 into NixOS:master Jun 9, 2023
@reckenrode reckenrode deleted the fish-darwin-sandbox branch June 11, 2024 22:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.topic: darwin Running or building packages on Darwin 10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 This PR causes between 11 and 100 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants