haskell-updates: update Hackage, in particular Cabal-3.8.1.0

[peterbecich]

Description of changes

produced with

./maintainers/scripts/haskell/update-stackage.sh
./maintainers/scripts/haskell/update-hackage.sh
./maintainers/scripts/haskell/regenerate-hackage-packages.sh

I am trying to get revision 2 of Cabal-3.8.1.0 into the package set: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/Cabal-3.8.1.0/revisions/

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[sternenseemann]

Looks like we are in good shape and haskell-updates can be merged in the next days. After that we'll start another regular rotation. We are seemingly all a bit short on time at the moment, so things are going a bit slower than usual.

[peterbecich]

@sternenseemann , thanks, can we include

       pname = "Cabal";
       version = "3.8.1.0";
       sha256 = "0236fddzhalsr2gjbjsk92rgh8866fks28r04g8fbmzkqbkcnr3l";
       revision = "2";

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/645175db2b2ecb4032005b2c24ff023d44cb6320/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/hackage-packages.nix#L2910-L2913 before haskell-updates is merged?

Should I slim down this PR to just this single change? Should I close the PR?

[sternenseemann]

See #217111/#219027

[peterbecich]

Thanks