Skip to content

haskellPackages: update list of broken packages#185409

Merged
sternenseemann merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
haskell-updates
Aug 6, 2022
Merged

haskellPackages: update list of broken packages#185409
sternenseemann merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
haskell-updates

Conversation

@sternenseemann
Copy link
Member

Turns out we can shrink the list of broken packages quite a bit as upstream projects adapt to GHC 9.0, aeson 2.0 etc.

Follow-up to #184194.

sternenseemann and others added 5 commits August 4, 2022 16:40
Empty list of broken and transitive broken packages to make Hydra build
all of them. After Hydra is finished, we'll be able to repopulate these
lists with mark-broken.sh and reveal some stale broken flags in the
process, hopefully.
This commit has been generated by maintainers/scripts/haskell/mark-broken.sh
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 6.topic: haskell General-purpose, statically typed, purely functional programming language label Aug 6, 2022
@ofborg ofborg bot added 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 101-500 This PR causes between 101 and 500 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500 This PR causes between 101 and 500 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Aug 6, 2022
Previously we used unsupported-platforms which is less correct, as the
criterium is support for SSE2.
@ofborg ofborg bot added the 8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft label Aug 6, 2022
The combination of the following dependencies…

* geomancy (only x86 due to intrinsics)
* vulkan (i686 and darwin don't work apparently)

…leaves us with effectively a single platform that works and we can test
in practice, x86_64-linux.
@mlen
Copy link

mlen commented Aug 28, 2022

Is there any chance to backport this to 22.05? This seems to affect it too: nix-shell -p haskell-language-server fails because hiedb tests fail.

@cdepillabout
Copy link
Member

@mlen we generally can't backport all of the changes in these haskell-updates PRs, although it is possible to backport individual changes if it makes sense.

What change exactly did you want to backport?

@mlen
Copy link

mlen commented Aug 29, 2022

Whoops, I accidentally commented on the incorrect PR, sorry. I meant to ask to backport dontCheck for hiedb in #184194

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.topic: haskell General-purpose, statically typed, purely functional programming language 8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 101-500 This PR causes between 101 and 500 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500 This PR causes between 101 and 500 packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants