Fix treeo, treex, elegy#166167
Conversation
|
Result of 4 packages built:
|
|
I'll go ahead and merge tomorrow unless anyone objects. |
6542a04 to
734ee96
Compare
|
nixpkgs-review is claiming that I've updated 930 packages which is clearly false. But All of the packages that are being updated in this PR build successfully manually. |
|
If you move the rich update to another PR I think we can target master with the other things. |
|
Is there a reason not to target rich to master? |
|
The 928 rebuilds on x86_64-linux. |
Oh gotcha, fair enough! |
734ee96 to
75235ab
Compare
|
Result of 8 packages built:
|
|
Ok I redid things, this time patching around the |
|
I also included the patch cgarciae/treeo#14 to workaround issue cgarciae/treex#68. |
75235ab to
db60f46
Compare
|
I'll go ahead and merge tomorrow unless anyone objects |
|
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review with nixpkgs-review-checks extension. It is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 8 packages built:
|
Description of changes
Follow up to #159933. Fix #159455.
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.shto update generated release notes