sgx-sdk, sgx-psw: 2.14 -> 2.15.1#149948
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: Was parallel building buggy?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, it failed randomly. Also, it's not too important to have it for the samples: they're tiny and build quickly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please switch to false instead and maybe add a comment. There are efforts to build all packages eventually in parallel.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That makes sense, thanks. Force-pushed a new version.
76d8998 to
124ad4b
Compare
|
Rebased, as #148593 is merged. I didn't test the AESM service on an SGX machine yet. |
Works fine! |
|
@veehaitch The AESM daemon runs fine. Good to merge from my end. |
Also add some of the new samples as tests. Disable parallel builds for the samples as they don't seem to support it (fail randomly).
124ad4b to
4f7f8d0
Compare
Motivation for this change
Also add some of the new samples as tests. Disable parallel builds for
the samples as they don't seem to support it (fail randomly).
Still a draft. Waiting for #148593.Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.shto update generated release notes