-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Figure out a pattern to break-out a NixOS Linux distribution "sub-site" (again) #633
Comments
why? i think that would be a good solution. we talked about domains that are free
can be solved with redirects |
Getting While yes, redirects can handle that, it "pollutes" the namespace for re-using it. E.g. we can't have Speaking of unfinished thought: the existing SEO and "mind share" of nixos.org being the Nix domain name is not something to take lightly. All of that is to say that it's not trivial, so whatever we do has to be thought of, thus the issue to figure out a pattern. |
This is strange, nix.com is owned by https://www.markmonitor.com/ but it is not used, do you happen to know @davidak or @samueldr if the nix team uses this solution? Or is it simply another person that took the domain through this platform? |
This issue has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/usability-study-session-2/21400/1 |
We already have some data on how other people perceive the situation: - NixOS/foundation#34 - NixOS/nix.dev#290 - NixOS/nixos-homepage#633 - https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nix-related-domains-that-i-control/10034 - NixOS/nix.dev#285 - NixOS/nixos-homepage#882 - NixOS/nixos-homepage#828 I claim, and the evidence linked above supports it, that multiple domains are not an important issue. What makes multiple domains problematic is a lack of distinct naming and assigning distinct meaning to those names.
The website is becoming more focused around Nix and the ecosystem.
This itself is not problematic; after all I think that jumping into the OS after being exposed to Nix and Nixpkgs is a good way to get introduced to the ecosystem.
But, with all those moves, we've not been entirely considering how to present the distribution itself.
After all, it is a next logical step for many users, and we're slowly squeezing the distribution content out of the site.
I believe most of this problem comes from the
nixos.org
name being the logical place to host the operating system based on Nix, but we can't really havenix.org
or anything like that I guess. Furthermore, moving the property could be harmful to existing links.I'm opening this as the tracking (and sadly not really actionable yet) issue so we can point to a unified discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: