docs: add another equivalence for the implication operator (backport #13232)#13585
Merged
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit into2.28-maintenancefrom Jul 30, 2025
Merged
Conversation
the second equivalence, using a if-else expression, aligns much closer to how most humans think about implication, adding it might help some people :) (cherry picked from commit 51151c2)
mergify
bot
added
automatic backport
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
the second equivalence, using a if-else expression, aligns much closer to how most humans think about implication, adding it might help some people :)
Context
Add 👍 to pull requests you find important.
The Nix maintainer team uses a GitHub project board to schedule and track reviews.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #13232 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).