Conversation
This includes NixOS/nixpkgs#342817 Flake lock file updates: • Updated input 'nixpkgs': 'github:NixOS/nixpkgs/c3d4ac725177c030b1e289015989da2ad9d56af0' (2024-08-15) → 'github:NixOS/nixpkgs/3a458f7c763ca62c6bf454b8d828bd86b7250671' (2024-09-18)
6275529 to
97bd6eb
Compare
|
There is a tiny test suite for the perl bindings, but it is indeed not useful for seeing if certain apps have upgraded. In this case the breaking change in the Perl bindings was intentional, so a mere test suite would not have caught it. |
| passthru = lib.optionalAttrs (stdenv.buildPlatform.canExecute stdenv.hostPlatform) { | ||
| perl-bindings = nix-perl-bindings; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I would rather not do that here (it doesn't work with the split packages so well), and instead just slap on the attribute for the nix-serve override.
|
I'm 👎 on this, since takes the |
In other projects, I've added overrides conditioned on e.g.
👍 let's make sure to fix that. |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2024-09-18-nix-team-meeting-minutes-179/52361/1 |
|
I worked on improving testing in nix-serve here: edolstra/nix-serve#61 |
|
Downstream maintainer of nix-serve is against this idea. |
Motivation
Avoid being caught by surprise when updating
nixin Nixpkgs.Alternatives:
Context
See context of Support Nix::Store from 2.21 onwards edolstra/nix-serve#60
Blocked on experimental feature flag as in nix-serve: unstable-2018-03-20 → unstable-2024-09-17 nixpkgs#342714
Priorities and Process
Add 👍 to pull requests you find important.
The Nix maintainer team uses a GitHub project board to schedule and track reviews.