fix(public): point llms.txt and offer.md buyer URLs at the clean non-307 paths - #57
fix(public): point llms.txt and offer.md buyer URLs at the clean non-307 paths#57nish3451 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…307 paths The deployed worker 307-redirects every .html form to its clean extensionless twin, so the machine-readable pair's buyer URLs named addresses that redirect before they serve. Point the audit and pricing URLs at https://tinystudio.io/audit and https://tinystudio.io/pricing (the addresses that serve 200) and move the check-site and agent-ui guard expectations to match.
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nish3451 has reached the 50-credit limit for trial accounts. To continue receiving code reviews, upgrade your plan.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 28 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Comment |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d187f48b69
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| assert.equal(preferred, "https://tinystudio.io/pricing", `price question ${question.id} must map to the clean /pricing`); | ||
| } | ||
| const offerLine = offerSection.split("\n").find((line) => line.includes(question.id)); | ||
| assert.ok(offerLine?.includes(preferred), `offer.md must mirror the preferred source page for ${question.id}`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If only offer.md regresses a preferred-source mapping to the old https://tinystudio.io/pricing.html or .../audit.html form, this test still passes because the clean preferred value is a prefix of that redirecting URL. The equivalent mirror check in check-site.mjs uses the same substring comparison, so CI would not enforce the stated clean-URL contract on both files; extract the URL from offerLine and compare it for equality instead.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nish3451 has reached the 50-credit limit for trial accounts. To continue receiving code reviews, upgrade your plan.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nish3451 has reached the 50-credit limit for trial accounts. To continue receiving code reviews, upgrade your plan.
…nt main and live (2026-08-21, lane 1, item 7a215e4e7a) (#279) The closed twin's fix PR #57 (commit d187f48, 'fix(public): point llms.txt and offer.md buyer URLs at the clean non-307 paths') was re-landed and merged to origin/main as PR #202 (squash c447585, 2026-08-15). This lane-1 closeout re-verifies the survivor tree authoritatively against current origin/main (92d55c3) and the live deployment: - public/llms.txt and public/offer.md both point every buyer URL at the clean form (/audit, /pricing) that serves 200; live md5 matches the worktree copy of both files. - /audit.html and /pricing.html still 307 to their clean twins (worker behavior unchanged from the twin's fix); /audit and /pricing serve 200. - The check-site and agent-ui guards require the clean form; a one-line revert (pricing.html) makes node scripts/check-site.mjs exit 1 with the named guard message; restore passes. - PR #57 closed 2026-08-15 with a comment naming survivor #202; the cluster is reconciled. No code change on this branch — opening a duplicate of PR #202 would recreate the duplicate open-PR cluster the fleet reconciled. The two remaining 'pricing.html' strings in llms.txt:6 and offer.md:3 are prose file-name references, not buyer URLs, and are outside the twin's fix scope (touched independently on branch growth/geo-llms-pricing-clean-b, origin/pr/275). Files: - docs/evidence/llms-offer-clean-buyer-urls-rereverify-2026-08-21-lane1.md (new evidence receipt) - .lane/reports/chore-llms-offer-clean-buyer-urls-rereverify-lane1-2026-08-21.md (lane-1 closeout) Co-authored-by: minimax-vps <minimax-vps@local>
1 participant
What
The deployed worker 307-redirects every
.htmlform to its cleanextensionless twin, so the buyer URLs in the machine-readable pair
(
public/llms.txt,public/offer.md) named addresses that redirectbefore they serve. Point them at the clean paths that serve 200:
https://tinystudio.io/audit.html→https://tinystudio.io/audithttps://tinystudio.io/pricing.html→https://tinystudio.io/pricingChanged in both files: the AI-search evidence artifact pointer, all
seven preferred-source mappings, and the price-and-terms pointers.
Guard updates
scripts/check-site.mjs: the offer-fact needle, the price-questionpreferred-source guard, the audit evidence-artifact pointer guard, and
the surrounding comments/messages now require the clean forms.
scripts/test-agent-ui.mjs: the offer-fact needle, the served-pagesmembership list, the price-question mapping assertion, and the
audit/pricing pointer assertions now require the clean forms.
Verification
curl -sI https://tinystudio.io/audit.html→ 307 →/audit;https://tinystudio.io/audit→ 200. Same shape for/pricing.npm run checkpasses.npm testpasses (headings 7, sitemap 53, worker 6, UI 16).