docs(evidence): re-verify CI queue re-starvation item — already resolved (both runners online, queue drains in minutes) - #283
Conversation
…ved (both runners online, queue drains in minutes) Re-confirms PRs #214/#217/#224: main's shared vps-verify label reaches both self-hosted runners; the ~60 queued observation was the 19:01Z wave of ~30 PRs × 2 jobs, drained in ~10 minutes with zero queue left. No workflow change required. Co-authored-by: CommandCodeBot <noreply@commandcode.ai>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 15 minutes Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?Wait for the limit to reset, then comment An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization. For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Free Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Note 🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit FreeYour organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/settings/billing. Comment |
Re-verification-only closeout for the item "The single self-hosted CI runner is the release choke point — ~60 queued verify/Gitleaks runs".
Verdict: already resolved — no repo change required
Consistent with PRs #214, #217, #224. Live verification (2026-08-21 03:35Z–03:45Z):
netcup-rs2000-tinystudio-verify1andnetcup-rs2000-tinystudio-verify2, both carrying the sharedvps-verifylabel.runs-on: [self-hosted, linux, x64, vps-verify]) — no per-instance labels.verifyjobs landed on verify1 (runs 32406421682, 32406448301) and verify2 (32406458318);Gitleakson verify2 (32406453899, 32406436263)..github/workflows/*(33 open PRs scanned by diff name-only).Evidence:
.lane/reports/ci-starvation-rereverify-lane1-20260821.md