Skip to content

docs(evidence): re-verify retired TinyStudio Agent Desk title/snippet finding (2026-08-17) - #236

Merged
nish3451 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
lane1/google-retired-agent-desk-snippet
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

docs(evidence): re-verify retired TinyStudio Agent Desk title/snippet finding (2026-08-17)#236
nish3451 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
lane1/google-retired-agent-desk-snippet

Conversation

@nish3451

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Re-verification receipt for item f41c8af0f8 — "Google still presents the
retired self-serve 'TinyStudio Agent Desk' title/snippet for tinystudio.io".

Verdict: every code-side path that fed Google the retired name is closed
on current main and verified on live — no new code change was needed.

The last consolidation path (the legacy /agent-desk page's canonical/og:url
still claiming the apex root) was merged today as PR #229 (798cd71) and is
served correctly in production.

What was verified

SERP measurement was attempted (DuckDuckGo/Bing) but curl fetches are
bot-blocked; Google's recrawl/index refresh is its own timetable and not
claimed here.

Files changed

  • docs/evidence/agent-desk-retired-title-rereverify-2026-08-17.md
  • .lane/reports/lane1-google-retired-agent-desk-snippet.md

… finding on current main and live (2026-08-17)

All code-side paths that fed Google the retired 'TinyStudio Agent Desk'
name are closed and live: PR #46 noindex+retired framing on the legacy
/agent-desk surface, PR #181 (05efed1) retiring the duplicate www host by
301 to apex, and PR #229 (798cd71, merged today) making the legacy page's
canonical/og:url name the clean /agent-desk instead of the apex root.

This lane re-verified every surface against origin/main 7d3a8ae and live:
apex title/description/canonical current with zero Agent Desk strings,
www (http+https, deep paths, query) 301s to apex, /agent-desk serves
noindex/nofollow retired framing with self-canonical, app/api 410, and
robots/sitemap/llms/offer all correct. npm run check passes, npm test is
green (121 tests, 0 failures), git diff --check clean. SERP measurement
was attempted but curl fetches are bot-blocked; index refresh is Google's
timetable. Closes item f41c8af0f8.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@nish3451, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 6 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Free

Run ID: 69efbcab-a63e-4a63-ad20-48fb170b135b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b07ebc8 and 0f172bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .lane/reports/lane1-google-retired-agent-desk-snippet.md
  • docs/evidence/agent-desk-retired-title-rereverify-2026-08-17.md

Note

🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit Free

Your organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/login.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

@nish3451
nish3451 merged commit 56c4e24 into main Aug 17, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant