docs(evidence): re-verify the Website Appraisal product contract on current main (2026-08-12) #148
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ | ||
| # Repository product contract: retired Agent Desk replaced by The Website Appraisal — re-verify 2026-08-12 | ||
|
|
||
| Date: 2026-08-12 | ||
| Scope: backlog item "[unreviewed-by-grok] Replace the retired Agent Desk as | ||
| the repository's active product contract — README, MEMORY, package metadata, | ||
| and the 'current plan' still direct agents to rebuild the wrong homepage" | ||
| (scout 2026-08-09, risk: amber, parity-risk). The finding was fixed and merged | ||
| as PR #58 (`11864a7`, "docs(contract): make the Website Appraisal the active | ||
| repo truth"), the abandoned round-1 candidate lane was closed out by PR #72 | ||
| (`872fd23`), and a closeout receipt re-verified the item on 2026-08-11. This | ||
| receipt re-verifies every acceptance criterion against the current head | ||
| (`ad9cee3`, 2026-08-12) and live, because the item is still tagged | ||
| unreviewed-by-grok and origin/main has moved since the 2026-08-11 receipt | ||
| (verified at `872fd23`). | ||
|
|
||
| ## What changed on main since the 2026-08-11 receipt | ||
|
|
||
| Commits between `872fd23` and `ad9cee3` (2026-08-12): three AI-search evidence | ||
| commits (`8606b0c`, `62eec0a`, `ed62202`), a docs/evidence ship-verify commit | ||
| (`43c9e14`), and merges of PR #141 and #43. None touch `README.md`, `MEMORY.md`, | ||
| `package.json`, the specs, or `scripts/test-product-contract.mjs` — the | ||
|
Comment on lines
+18
to
+21
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The claimed range is incomplete: Useful? React with 👍 / 👎. |
||
| product-contract surfaces are unchanged since the 2026-08-11 verification. | ||
| The item's acceptance criteria were re-checked deterministically on this head. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Acceptance criteria — repository (current head `ad9cee3`) | ||
|
|
||
| 1. README, package description, and active MEMORY/current-plan guidance | ||
| describe The Website Appraisal and human-reviewed delivery truth. | ||
| - `README.md` opens "TinyStudio's public website: The Website Appraisal — | ||
| the free leak audit of high-ticket service homepages — and the | ||
| human-reviewed desk that closes what the audit finds" and declares | ||
| `specs/004-website-appraisal/plan.md` the current product contract under | ||
| "Current Plan"; the Agent Desk is documented only as a retired legacy | ||
| surface. | ||
| - `MEMORY.md` states the current offer is The Website Appraisal with | ||
| human-reviewed delivery, names `specs/004-website-appraisal/plan.md` the | ||
| current plan, marks the self-serve Agent Desk retired, and preserves the | ||
| still-live legacy mechanics under "Legacy Agent Desk". | ||
| - `package.json` description: "TinyStudio public website: The Website | ||
| Appraisal and the human-reviewed desk on Cloudflare Workers." | ||
| 2. Historical Agent Desk specs are clearly labeled historical/retired (or | ||
| superseded by a current Appraisal plan) without erasing still-live | ||
| `/api/agent-audit` mechanics. | ||
| - `specs/001-public-buyer-page/plan.md` and `spec.md`: | ||
| "Status: HISTORICAL — retired." | ||
| - `specs/002-minimal-input-agent-desk/plan.md` and `spec.md`: | ||
| "Status: HISTORICAL — retired." | ||
| - `specs/003-wellness-clinic-launch/plan.md`: "Status: SUPERSEDED — | ||
| historical campaign plan." | ||
| - `specs/004-website-appraisal/plan.md`: "Status: CURRENT", describing the | ||
| public contract, legacy mechanics (still-live `/api/agent-audit`), and | ||
| boundaries. | ||
| 3. One deterministic check fails if active product descriptors again call the | ||
| public root a self-serve Agent Desk. | ||
| - `scripts/test-product-contract.mjs` (wired in as `npm run test:contract`, | ||
| part of the `npm test` chain) rejects old Agent Desk framings and | ||
| misplaced/conflicting status claims; the "known bad shape" fixtures prove | ||
| the rejections. | ||
| 4. `npm test` passes; `/api/agent-audit` tests remain truthful and passing. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Results (2026-08-12, fresh run on this head) | ||
|
|
||
| - `npm run test:contract` — 8/8 pass, incl. fixtures "checker rejects the old | ||
| Agent Desk framings" and "checker rejects misplaced, conflicting, and | ||
| contradictory truth". | ||
| - `npm run check` — "TinyStudio.io checks passed." | ||
| - `npm run test:headings` — 6/6; `npm run test:sitemap` — 7/7; | ||
| `npm run test:worker` — 55/55 (incl. legacy `/api/agent-audit` mechanics); | ||
| `npm run test:ui` — 16/16. | ||
| - Full `npm test` chain — 92/92 pass, exit 0. | ||
|
Comment on lines
+68
to
+70
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On this commit's actual tree, Useful? React with 👍 / 👎. |
||
|
|
||
| ## Results (live, 2026-08-12) | ||
|
|
||
| - `https://tinystudio.io/` titles "TinyStudio — The Website Appraisal" with | ||
| zero Agent Desk / self-serve mentions on the homepage. | ||
| - `https://tinystudio.io/agent-desk` titles "TinyStudio — the retired Agent | ||
| Desk". | ||
| - `https://tinystudio.io/llms.txt` presents "## Legacy Self-Serve Agent Desk … | ||
| is demoted and is not the product TinyStudio sells" alongside The Website | ||
| Appraisal as current. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Conclusion | ||
|
|
||
| The item's acceptance criteria are met on current main and live: repository | ||
| instructions and metadata (README, MEMORY, package description, current plan) | ||
| name The Website Appraisal and human-reviewed delivery as the active product | ||
| contract, the retired Agent Desk is labeled historical/retired without erasing | ||
| still-live `/api/agent-audit` mechanics, the deterministic contract guard is | ||
| wired into `npm test`, and the full suite (92/92) plus live surfaces verify the | ||
| current truth on this head. Nothing further to change; the item can be ticked. | ||
|
Comment on lines
+89
to
+90
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The commit's parent already records in Useful? React with 👍 / 👎. |
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This receipt does not verify the commit it lands on:
ed46ff9has first parent0e357e0, while this line calls the olderad9cee3revision the current head;fe4d2ae,883e106, and0e357e0intervene. Consequently, the later claims that checks were freshly run “on this head” do not establish results for the actual current tree. Re-run and pin the verification to0e357e0(or explicitly qualifyad9cee3as a historical baseline).Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.