fix(evidence): drop retired Agent Desk from q5 ground truth in AI-search controlled questions - #137
fix(evidence): drop retired Agent Desk from q5 ground truth in AI-search controlled questions#137nish3451 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…rch controlled questions
The q5 truth ('What is tinystudio.io?') named the retired Agent Desk as part
of the current offer. The Agent Desk is legacy, not the product TinyStudio
sells; the site's own q5 answer is 'This site: the leak audit and the desk
behind it.' Replace the truth with the current offer language, consistent
with q1's 'a desk that closes the leaks the audit finds', and regenerate the
embedded bundle in public/audit.html so the drift guard passes.
Re-lands PR #90 (fix/q5-ground-truth-drop-agent-desk), which carries the same
two-file change but is now conflict-locked against main.
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nish3451 has reached the 50-credit limit for trial accounts. To continue receiving code reviews, upgrade your plan.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 10 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Comment |
|
Closing as superseded. The goal — drop the retired Agent Desk from the q5 ground truth in the AI-search controlled questions — is already satisfied on main with different wording: main's q5 truth is 'tinystudio.io is TinyStudio's own site: the free leak audit of high-ticket service homepages, and the human-reviewed desk that closes what the audit finds.' (merged via PR #43 / ed62202). The retired Agent Desk is no longer named in q5 on main, so this branch's change is redundant. |
…intake response (rebase of #116) (#245) * fix(worker): honor the six-a-month intake cap with a truthful closed-intake response Rebase of PR #116 (fix/signup-monthly-cap-lane1) onto current main, resolving conflicts with the daily rate-limit and storage-failure tests added since the branch was cut. The cap counter write fails closed to 503 when D1 is unavailable, so the existing storage-failure honesty tests still pass. - src/worker.js: MAX_APPRAISALS_PER_MONTH constant, monthly cap check in signupResponse, closedIntakeResponse() self-contained 409 page. - scripts/check-site.mjs: static source guards for the cap. - scripts/test-agent-worker.mjs: CountingFakeDB/CountingFakeStatement + 3 tests (JSON cap, browser cap, invalid-email-no-slot). * docs(evidence): triage closeout for parked PRs #116/#128/#137 (2026-08-18) --------- Co-authored-by: minimax-vps <minimax-vps@fleet.local>
1 participant
What
The q5 ground truth (
What is tinystudio.io?) in the AI-search controlled questions still names the retired Agent Desk as part of the current offer:The Agent Desk is legacy, not the product TinyStudio sells. The site's own q5 answer (homepage identity block) is "This site: the leak audit and the desk behind it." Replace the truth with the current-offer language, consistent with q1's "a desk that closes the leaks the audit finds", and regenerate the embedded bundle in
public/audit.htmlso the drift guard passes.Files
evidence-fixtures/ai-search/controlled-questions.json— q5 truth now names the leak audit + the desk that closes the leaks, not the retired Agent Desk.public/audit.html— embedded AI-search evidence bundle regenerated from the fixtures (single-line JSON, byte-consistent withJSON.stringify({questions, evidence})).Why a new branch
This is a fresh-base re-land of PR #90 (
fix/q5-ground-truth-drop-agent-desk, same two-file change, same wording), which is now conflict-locked (mergeStateStatus: DIRTY) against current main after #102 and the 2026-08-12 evidence re-runs. This branch sits directly on currentorigin/main(18128e8).Validation
npm run check— passed (drift guard: embedded bundle matches fixtures exactly).npm test— all pass: check, headings 6/6, sitemap 7/7, worker 55/55, ui 16/16, contract 8/8.