Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(repeater): adopt self-deploying repeaters #175

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ostridm
Copy link
Contributor

@ostridm ostridm commented Jun 13, 2024

closes #174

@ostridm ostridm added the Type: enhancement New feature or request. label Jun 13, 2024
@ostridm ostridm self-assigned this Jun 13, 2024
Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Jun 13, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
11416982 Triggered Generic High Entropy Secret 9b215af test/SecTester.Repeater.Tests/Bus/DefaultRepeaterBusFactoryTests.cs View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

@ostridm ostridm force-pushed the feat_#174/adopt-self-delpoying-repeater branch from 515d8ed to ccf313f Compare June 13, 2024 09:19
src/SecTester.Repeater/IRepeater.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/SecTester.Repeater/IRepeaterFactory.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/SecTester.Repeater/Bus/SocketIoRepeaterBus.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/SecTester.Repeater/Bus/SocketIoRepeaterBus.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/SecTester.Repeater/Bus/SocketIoRepeaterBus.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/SecTester.Repeater/Bus/DefaultRepeaterBusFactory.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Base automatically changed from feat_#172/remove-amqp-communication-transport to master June 17, 2024 09:43
Bumps [braces](https://github.com/micromatch/braces) from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3.
- [Changelog](https://github.com/micromatch/braces/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](micromatch/braces@3.0.2...3.0.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: braces
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@ostridm ostridm closed this Jun 17, 2024
@ostridm ostridm force-pushed the feat_#174/adopt-self-delpoying-repeater branch from ccf313f to 4606a14 Compare June 17, 2024 11:15
@ostridm ostridm reopened this Jun 17, 2024
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 9d2577c and detected 2 issues on this pull request.

Here's the issue category breakdown:

Category Count
Duplication 2

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 96.2% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

@ostridm ostridm marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2024 11:39
@ostridm ostridm requested review from derevnjuk and removed request for derevnjuk June 17, 2024 11:42
@ostridm ostridm marked this pull request as draft June 18, 2024 04:20
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ namespace SecTester.Repeater.Bus;

public interface IRepeaterBusFactory
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See NeuraLegion/sectester-js#197 (comment). Let's rename to  IBridgeService

@derevnjuk
Copy link
Member

@ostridm the last commit consists a unwanted chagnes. you have to preserve the ability to use the predefined ID. The user of SecTester.Repeater should be able to run a repeater with a constant ID. Such changes in the public interface must be avoided.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: enhancement New feature or request.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adopt self-deploying repeaters
2 participants