Move Rolling Backup Count under the Rolling Backup toggle - #1485
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Was sitting on the same row at columns 3-4; now on its own row directly below the toggle for clearer visual grouping. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
BitcrushedHeart
pushed a commit
to BitcrushedHeart/OneTrainer
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2026
Was sitting on the same row at columns 3-4; now on its own row directly below the toggle for clearer visual grouping. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "Rolling Backup Count" label and entry were placed on the same grid row as the "Rolling Backup" toggle (columns 3–4), visually separated from the control they belong to. This moves them to their own row directly below the toggle (row 2, columns 0–1), making the grouping obvious at a glance.
Drafted by Claude
It's better here because it's the only element that needs a 5th frame column, which looks weird in both UIs