-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix improve mode #507
Fix improve mode #507
Conversation
* Better explanations in VEHICLE MODE * AccessMode now works TRANSFERs and OTHER LEG (for OJP) * Some depreciations
Deprecated not Depreciated ;-)
Deprecated not Depreciated ;-)
xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_mode_support.xsd
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
</xsd:enumeration> | ||
<xsd:enumeration value="lift"> | ||
<xsd:annotation> | ||
<xsd:documentation>General Mode for Modes moved by cable. Especially lifts are not only vertical elevators. If a better specialisation applies (like cableway) use that.</xsd:documentation> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this should also include all sorts of elevators? There exist hydraulic and cogwheel-driven elevators. Proposal: "Mode for elevators and for modes moved by cable...."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, make it a suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather go to the Vehicle/Lift Equipment description to go to that level of details (modes are expected to be generic)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@trurlurl can you accept Christophe's comment and we don't change it here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@trurlurl sorry is merged already. so done.
…t.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]>
xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_mode_support.xsd
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…t.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]>
* Update netex_nm_vehicleMeetingPointAssignment_support.xsd (#506) Co-authored-by: ue71603 <[email protected]> * Fix improve mode (#507) * First draft of the clean up of MODE * Better explanations in VEHICLE MODE * AccessMode now works TRANSFERs and OTHER LEG (for OJP) * Some depreciations * added a mode to Connection * Update netex_mode_support.xsd Deprecated not Depreciated ;-) * Update netex_submode_version.xsd Deprecated not Depreciated ;-) * Apply suggestions from code review * Lint and update documentation tables * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_mode_support.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_mode_support.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: ue71603 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> * Fix passenger information equipment list (#510) * The connection exists in the documentation, but was not done in the xsd NeTEx part 1, figure 628 * Fixed according to Christophe's proposal * Apply suggestions from code review * Update xsd/netex_part_1/part1_tacticalPlanning/netex_passengerInformationEquipment_version.xsd * Lint and update documentation tables --------- Co-authored-by: ue71603 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Fix typo's (#511) * Introduce VAT (#516) * Introduce VAT number * Removing duplicate enumeration (thanks to David) (#509) * Removing duplicate enumeration (thanks to David) btw something is wrong with xsd\netex_part_1\part1_ifopt\netex_ifopt_equipmentAccess_support.xsd in next * Lint and update documentation tables * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_nm_equipmentEnergy_support.xsd Co-authored-by: Matthias Günter <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: ue71603 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * enhancement-TMTC-add ACCEPTED DRIVER PERMITs Add ACCEPTED DRIVER PERMITS to VEHICEL TYpe * lint * revert non-changes * revert non-changes * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_vehicleType_version.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> * Apply suggestions from code review * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_vehicleType_version.xsd * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_vehicleType_version.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_vehicleType_version.xsd * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_vehicleType_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_vehicleType_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: ue71603 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nicholas Knowles <[email protected]>
* First draft of the clean up of MODE * Better explanations in VEHICLE MODE * AccessMode now works TRANSFERs and OTHER LEG (for OJP) * Some depreciations * added a mode to Connection * Update netex_mode_support.xsd Deprecated not Depreciated ;-) * Update netex_submode_version.xsd Deprecated not Depreciated ;-) * Apply suggestions from code review * Lint and update documentation tables * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_mode_support.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_mode_support.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: ue71603 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]>
* DEckPlan changes Revised rebased Rbaseddeck plane ready to fix * Lint and update documentation tables * enhancement-SIte levels, SIteStructure, LevelInStructure GroupOfSItes Adds SIteStructure to allow alternative labelling of levels within a site. Also GroupOfSItes and GroupOfTariffZones added to SiteFrame. Test example also provided * Lint and update documentation tables * Lint and update documentation tables * Lint and update documentation tables * Fix typo * Fix examples * Fix improve mode (#507) * First draft of the clean up of MODE * Better explanations in VEHICLE MODE * AccessMode now works TRANSFERs and OTHER LEG (for OJP) * Some depreciations * added a mode to Connection * Update netex_mode_support.xsd Deprecated not Depreciated ;-) * Update netex_submode_version.xsd Deprecated not Depreciated ;-) * Apply suggestions from code review * Lint and update documentation tables * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_mode_support.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_mode_support.xsd Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: ue71603 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]> * Update fix validation * Enhancee Seeting plan 615 Add child beds Add extra enum values to bed ty[e * Update netex_spotEquipment_version.xsd * Deck Plan examples and fixes Add bus and train examples for deck plans. Fix various equipment issues. Revise DEckPlanassignment * Fix examples * LiftCallEquipment added * Updated deckplan examples Add deck plane xamples and update deck path * fix xml example * Enhancement-Add Deck Paths and DEckplan Examples (1) Refactor Path Links and Navigation Paths as a generic PATH LINK stub in core . Place common enums as Reusable environment_support package. (2) Revise IFOPT pt1 SItePathLinks to extend generic PathLink (3) Also Add DECK PATH and DECK NAVIGATION PATHs to extend generic Path Link. Add new constraints to pub file. (4) Add Bus DEck Plan example (5) Add extensive train DECK PLAN example with train make up and boarding poistion akigmnet and Deck Navigation path example. ALso had to fix upo some existing example to pass validation PassengerCapacity * Update * Extend DECK Plan Examples and add Transmodel enhancements to TRAIN ELEEMNT Extend the DECK PLAN Examples Apply Transmodel enhancements to ELEMENT TYPES and TRAINs Revise VEHICLE Add ROLLING STOCK * Update * DECK Plan Examples add constraints Add Constraints to publication * DECK Plan example - fix broken examples Tidy up to fix broken exampels - correction to constraing * Fix branch Notice that the examples still miss RelativeLevelOrder. * examples adapted to new RelativeLevelOrder and RelativeLevelOrder optional and a small validity problem (#430) Examples adapted to new RelativeLevelOrder and RelativeLevelOrder optional. We otherwise have examples that break. And it might be that people don't wish to use them. * DEck Plan Path links Integrate with other changes * update * DEckPlans Add in Stefan Jugelts simplified train deck plan example Add in simplified train deck plan example. thanks stefan * DEckPlan- AddPply norway commenst Minor revisions to SeatingPlan/DeckPlan (a) Use an enum rather that ByWindow ByAisle boolean (b) Revise PassengerSPot HasTable boolean to use ENum toinidcate type of table c) Add a DeckWindowType enum Examples updated * Lint and update documentation tables * Ypdate with 641 addition of maximumvelocity * DeckPlans Add missing VehicleSide for DeckWindow - Stefan Jugelt noted there was no way to set relative posiition of a DEckWindow, have corrected to use Vehicle side as for DEckENtrance * Progress * Update examples * trying to fix some (or undo it, if it does not help... * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_trainElement_version.xsd * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_trainElement_version.xsd * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_trainElement_version.xsd * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_trainElement_version.xsd * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_trainElement_version.xsd * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_trainElement_version.xsd * I don't like windows users * Add netex:EquipmentPlace to SitePathLink_Place_KeyRef * Extension back to restriction * fix train validation * Deckplan examples "validate", look for commented out sections. * Add version/id to PassengerCapacity * Reintroduce FlooringStatus * Add TactileWarningStrip, TactileWarningStripContract back * linting only * Make the SensorEquipment_ dummy abstract * redoneccb6e2f from °674 introducinng spotaffinity * remove wrongfiles * redo * redo of 48618f0 from#695 * redo of 7f89c10 from #695 DECK PLAN ASSIGNMENT revision * DEckPlan further correction redo of a3d4fa8 from #695 * fix include problem * Things to review by Nick * check all other examples * swithing removal of parentzoneref * Lint and update documentation tables * reestablish complexest Deckplan example. * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_deckPath_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_deckPath_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_deckPath_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> * fixed some typos * fix missing PathInstructions in SitePathJunction * Lint and update documentation tables * fix duplicate elements and an order="0" * Update xsd/netex_framework/netex_genericFramework/netex_place_support.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * Typo's * More typo's Co-authored-by: Matthias Günter <[email protected]> * More typo's * Update xsd/netex_part_1/part1_networkDescription/netex_routeInstruction_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_part_1/part1_tacticalPlanning/netex_stopAssignment_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_part_1/part1_tacticalPlanning/netex_stopAssignment_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_part_1/part1_tacticalPlanning/netex_stopAssignment_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_part_1/part1_tacticalPlanning/netex_stopAssignment_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_part_1/part1_tacticalPlanning/netex_stopAssignment_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * Update xsd/netex_part_1/part1_tacticalPlanning/netex_stopAssignment_version.xsd Co-authored-by: Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> * remove removed parts completly. * Update netex_trainElement_version.xsd I would like to see this element to be 'moved up'. For example above TrainInCompoundTrainGroup, so it does not look to be removed and added. * description relvovling door * Lint and update documentation tables * Update netex_accessRightParameter_version.xsd added inlcude so that VehicleRef is known * Lint and update documentation tables --------- Co-authored-by: Nicholas Knowles <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: ue71603 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christophe Duquesne <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: trurlurl <[email protected]>
Fix #376 (directly on master)
@Aurige would this be ok?